advance climate change by….destroying art? makes all kinds of sense
 

A lot of climate protesters aren’t too bright

https://www.greenmatters.com/climate...k-pour-protest
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

this is a sincere question…isn’t it bad for cows not to milk them? doesn’t it hurt them to not be milked?

No idea, but I do know it’s idiotic to dump perfectly good food.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you’re saying pouring out milk won’t restore the glaciers?

You do know the art is protected from just such an event. Or do you not understand or believe the link between the animal agriculture and global warming? This is the perfect set up for Scott, we will all be asked if we are driving our electric vehicles on the way to buy our all veggie diet requirements.

I didn't know the paintings were protected, until the environmental terrorists started doing this. The fact that the art is protected, makes their actions MORE stupid, if that's even possible.

you're right, I don't understand the link between animal agriculture and global warming, I know what your side is claiming, but I don't know what's fact.

Sorry if I'm not planning to become a vegan on the say-so of those who think the solution is to throw tomato soup on a Van Gough.

but apparently not protected from miscreant leftists with soup....

Your funny..

You didn’t start a single post about Jan6th ?

This is the 2nd soup incident this month aka peaceful protest

And apparently it got your goat.. to funny

FYI I searched Gen Flynn Re Awakening tour on Fox

Last story was 2 months ago

And it was reporting victim hood

New York pastor and ReAwaken tour host say they were harassed by prosecutors

Guess that’s why you never heard of them
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

until the environmental terrorists Started doing This

Yep keep insisting you haven’t been radicalized


The fact that the art is protected, makes their actions MORE stupid, if that's even possible.

Your comment proves it is possible
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

they’re attempting to destroy priceless art, unless we meet their political
demands. that’s a terrorist.

If they know the art has glass in front of it protecting it how are they attempting to destroy it?

So you admit the painting was protected but you still believe that by throwing mashed pot. at the art they're attempting to destroy the art?

Seems like a contradictory statement.

yes, i’m sure their intent was to destroy it. they’re not very bright, you see.

not if they didn’t know the art was protected. the geniuses who threw tomato soup on a painting last week, yelled “what’s more important! life or art?”.

that suggests they believed they were destroying the art.

if they were rational, they’d be republicans.

Are the oil companies going to respond?
Are any people going to immediately halt using petroleum products because of this?
Are Investments going to shift away from oil investments?

Why is it so hard to just say they’re idiots? They threw potatoes at a painting and glued themselves to the wall…..there’s not a lot that’s more idiotic than that. :rolleyes:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you can look this up…the group doing this, is funded by an heiress to the Getty fortune! so she feels guilty. i bet not so guilty that she gave her inheritance away.

well, there's chaining yourself to your friends across a highway....pulling a statue down on top of yourself or others.....setting yourself on fire....chasing someone with an AR who is a really good shot.....

You’ll notice I left a little wiggle room
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

And that's what you think is actually happening> that is Amazing

That is a very deep and key question, and gets to the heart of where the left is right now. None of them will ever just say "my god they're idiots". Because as Jordan Peterson says, they don't merely "believe" in liberalism. They are enslaved by it. The Narrative can never be wrong.

He calls it "the pathology of ideological possession", and he's right. They are literally possessed by liberalism.

Ok, Einstein, how come you didn't tell us what's actually happening. The group that did this last week, as they threw tomato soup on priceless paintings, yelled "what's more important, art or life"?

Why did they yell that as they were doing what they did?

:scream:

jim thinks they are terrorist.. LOL but protesting in a state house armed is Freedom :kewl:

It's not something that's going to change what oil companies or Governments do or don't do .. and I doubt they think that was the objective .

But their stunt did what it was intended to do It drew some attention to an issue they clearly care about .. and call it dumb or smart it matters little to me
it's not like we haven't seen this style of protest before Across the planet

[QUOTE=wdmso;1234476]

And that's what you think is actually happening> that is Amazing

/QUOTE]

because throwing stuff on priceless art is not trying to destroy priceless art?

which one was a crime and which one wasn't?

I wish they glued their faces to the wall....

You can't help yourself?

But you're 100% wrong as they knew the art was protected

“We’re not asking the question, should everyone be throwing soup at paintings?” said Plummer. “What we’re doing is getting the conversation going so we can ask the questions that matter.”

"“I want to make one thing perfectly clear, we did no damage to the painting whatsoever,”

Which again Paul, tells us nothing about what they set out to do. Real MENSA candidates.

They're clueless idiots, that's all they are.

The wussification and dumbing-down of todays kids, is going to serve my kids quite nicely. My kids work their butts off and know how to take "no" for an answer sometimes. These kids will have no chance against my kids in the real world. None.

"But you're 100% wrong as they knew the art was protected"

How do you know what they knew, when they threw soup on the painting.

"“We’re not asking the question, should everyone be throwing soup at paintings?” said Plummer."

No, the question we're asking is, "did the bedroom you grew up in, have lead paint on your walls"?

"What we’re doing is getting the conversation going"

That's self flattery. That conversation has been going for 40 years, this just makes that side look like laughing stocks.

Its classic was just watching Fox news show Outnumbered

Must be fox's answer to the view I guess

And one of the host referred to the Mashed potato Stunt as eco Terrorist ..

it just a coincidence Jim made the same claim :rotflmao:

[QUOTE=scottw;1234482]So you think thats was their plan Ya ok!! I bet you think there terrorist along with Jim

heheh...that's pretty funny:kewl:

Now you sound like your father and grandfather and mine .. who i bet laughed when these kids tried to change the world... Jim like it or not these Kids have commitment .

Well they said others can't compete because of their skin color, which is absurd because it says NOTHING. I say these kids can't compete because they're stupid, lazy, entitled, snowflakes, which is a lot more representative about future prospects, than skin color.

A liberal, saying it's wrong to judge people on skin color, that's a riot. It's all your side does.

What power you must have, to know all there is about a protester you've never met and if you answered honestly (doubtful), you know absolutely nothing about. There have been and always will be, hard working, very successful young and old participating in non-violent civil protests. You are a mirror of the rhetoric that comes out of the far right, judgement by action, skin color, age, race yada yada yada.

"to know all there is about a protester you've never met "

you never post assumptions or opinions about people you've never met? Hmmm?

"judgement by action, skin color, age, race yada yada yada"

Yes, the right is more concerned with race than the left. Please share more wisdom with us! The left NEVER thinks about race! NEVER!

Not sure if you have been to a world class museum/gallery but you can see the glass in front of the paintings.

Totally agree it was stupid but they don't care about that. They want publicity - which they got. They prob. could care less about making $ and are more worried about saving the planet.

Fixed it for you...