Palin
 

What is wrong with this girl? :wall:

She was at T-Party today supporting John McCain. :smash:

McCain needs to be voted out, he has been in office over 22 years. He is part of the problem.

You are joking...right?

-spence

leather and spandex she looked good

No!!! I'm not joking :yak:

She may look good, but tell me, did she dye her hair?

Sarah is smooooking hot..
 

Hot baby!

Sarah needs to be hit by a truck.

Can't wait for her reality show on TLC.

I agree.Damn fine lookin woman.

Haven't we been through this "wishing people dead thing" ?????

Why would you want to deprive the rest of us of such a fine looking woman?She's very hot and the last thing the rest of us 40+ guys want is to see is Sarah hit by a truck,we like her.....a lot.

What do looks have to do with politics?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Be like a Republican, use her once and discard her. :uhuh:

Well maybe twice!

Absolutely nothing.

But since politics and government in general has become a complete joke since since Nov. 09,looks are all that's left.

Who would you rather look at,Sarah or Michelle?And don't be politically correct...Sarah makes any woman even near her age look like a toad, including Michelle Obama.

Screw the reality show,we need a Playboy spread!

Some of these guys have Pelosie posters on there bathroom wall.:rotf2:

Go to Casey's in town here and you will see better looking 40 somethings on any given night. I don't get the whole Palin thing at all.

:drool:.......








...not!!!

Pelosi = :yak6:

[QUOTE=buckman;757815]Some of these guys have Pelosie posters on there bathroom wall.:rotf2:

Pelosie's picture is painted on the bottom of my toilet. :rotf2: :rotf2:

4 kids? as been stated here before, I bet she looks better in clothes then out of them....

Pelosi
 

Pelosi is walking birth control! Plus, she is a nut case in my opinion. Imagine that nut in command of the nation?

That was a surprise response!:rolleyes:

In or out Sarah's HOT!

Jealousy doesn't work here...hot is hot,clothes or not.I would love to see any woman look that good after four!If you're comparing that hag Pelosi to Palin than you need to be brought out to pasture and freakin shot!


The best those two will look,you the public be the judge.

Sarah's such a hag...but man Nancy!!!

I think Sarah's pic is photoshopped.

Ya think?

-spence

Ya think?!:doh:

But that's ok.I'm gonna hit the bathroom and dream about that hottie Nancy.....I can barely contain myself.Those wrinkles,those saggy t..................OH GOD!!!!!!!!

Get a grip boys.Sarah's hot and Nancy certainly is not.

This was NEVER a political discussion.

Oh, I thought you thought it was real. How stupid of me.
In any case, I think with a few beers and muzzle to shut her up, she could be fun

Since you're posting on the forums, I know you have internet. You must be aware of the breadth of hot women on the internet that you don't have to hear spew painstakingly choreographed appearances?

Looks have little to do with politics, but quite a bit with electability. The sad truth of our appearance driven society, is that there's no upside to being ugly. Being ugly hurts when you are in, what is to large degree, a national popularity contest.
Say, average looks = 100%, meaning their looks have little to do negatively or positively with respect to electability. Two gray-haired men in their 60's look almost the same - looks are not an issue in this instance, but throw in a cougar like Palin, and things change.
A candidate with below average looks will suffer some loss because people do discriminate based upon looks. So the physically unappealing candidate will suffer, they will typically lose some votes and have a quality factor of less than 100% - they may come in at .98 or maybe less.
Conversely, other factors being even, a candidate with above average looks will typically garner 100% of the people that vote on issues or party lines, plus the people who vote on 'appearance and feeling.' They may have an appearance advantage that results in them garnering, 1.02 or 2% more votes.
When an ugly candidate runs against an attractive candidate, it's really bad for the less appealing candidate, as they get hit on both sides of the equation.

Just what I was thinking when I read the first post.

Jesus, what did Henry Waxman's opponents look like that he was ever able to get elected ????

:rotf2::rotf2: I think the same thing every time I see him.
But then again, it's a fact that conservatives are better looking then liberals

Now you're the one bringing up race.

I hate to admit it but...
 

if Sarah was not such a babe....I probably would not be very interested in her.