Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...-arrest-218028 |
Quote:
I can provide links, you'll just dismiss them. You have to put your time in and read for yourself. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What data makes you "fairly certain" that other foreign governments were in her server? Sounds like speculation. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But why don't we just follow the model for most other investigations. Assume Clinton is guilty of mass deception and fraud and just dig and dig because you're going to find it eventually. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
She's disqualified whether her actions were legal or illegal. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your post was full of the implication that you somehow know better, have a better "sense." Similar to the previous post a little before this when you said: "The fundamental lack of understanding you guys have over this topic is most certainly mind boggling." Your know better than the rest of us. Or so you think. |
Quote:
How did you make out with the broken office chair by the way. I considered having you come to me and I would weld it for you but we don't really have that kind of relationship for lack of a better term. Besides if the weld fails I don't want you to try and hold me responsible for any injury. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
There is an old adage Spence, that "Pride goes before the fall." I personally have found that to be true and have seen many others fall hard from the same thing. Just sayin. :hihi: I asked very simple questions where we differ in the truth and facts. Being we are at different ends of the spectrum with this email thing I wondered where you got such 180 deg info. As bright and well read as you would have some believe, I thought it would be easy for you to show me your facts. But instead you throw it back on me that you are better read and versed than me. That's OK, I'll just assume you and Obama are cut from the same cloth and you know best. NOT. :) Watch the Pride doesn't bite you in the arse. :hihi: |
Quote:
Its illegal to operate under the influence, there is the crime. You can own your own server. You can run it 24/7 if you want. You can load it up with all the files you want. Hillary is free to store all her leather thong and corset pics she wants (feel free to file that visual away in your spank bank) Its illegal to mis-handle, whether with intent or through negligence, classified material. She signed an NDA to that fact saying that when she took her position as SecState. Her defenders are always quick to say that she didn't do anything illegal by having her server and think that covers it.....its not the fact that she had a server.....its what she did with it that is the problem. |
Quote:
Spence OBVIOUSLY stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night... |
Quote:
Palin is an idiot. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But if she created a situation, where her staff knew that if they wanted her to review stuff she needed to see, that it would have to go to her personal server...and if she knew that some of the stuff sent to her personal server was going to be stuff that doesn't belong there...one might be able to make a compelling case of a crime. She said she didn't want to be inconvenienced with carrying two devices, right? So how can she handle all that being President entails? |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
LOL, get back to work. :) |
Quote:
Clinton being forwarded what's considered at the time benign information, that years later is deemed sensitive during a public release process is not mishandling information. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com