Hillary's Email Server
 

Iranian nuke scientist that was executed was on Hillary's private email server, amazing....disappeared in saudi arabia...no one knew where he was.....I'm sure spence and wdmso would say just a coincidence.

I think this is 57 they have gotten killed?

Also, aside from the email scandal
Think it's up to 5 people now turned up dead since the dnc.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

WHAT?NO WAY!!!

A mysterious death associated with the Clintons?No way.not even remotely possible.This is no more plausible than 400mil going to Iran to release 4 hostages.

You people make me sick.When are you dopes going to learn?Its Bush's fault dammit!

The Clintons prefer to call them "collateral damage "
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Hillary should be looked at as "less than honorable".
http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-...226995?ref=yfp
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think you missed this part.

Saucier's defense disputes a probation officer's conclusion that the sailor intended to share some of the photos with "foreign agencies," an allegation that prosecutors have not made publicly.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

seem the only coincidence is you never met a conspiracy theory you (aka most people here) didn’t like.

Again more of the same from those who get spoon feed their information via questionable internet sources and you guy have the never to cry about the National media



Despite what you might read on Donald Trump’s twitter feed, the Iranian execution of a nuclear scientist who defected to the United States and then changed his mind was not caused by Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. The scientist outed himselfClinton talked publicly about the case at the time. “He’s free to go. He was free to come. These decisions are his alone to make,” she said on July 13, 2010.

the "coincidences" involving the Clinton's are so numerous it's hard to keep track of them all over time....

seems like many coincidences of Bill getting big buck speaking fees from entities with business before Hillary Inc....but probably just all "coincidence"

as is the coincidence the right can't prove a thing

But I guess speaking fee's are only acceptable for those you agree with

1. Current Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is one of the highest-paid public speakers in the world, reportedly reeling in up to $1.5 million per speech. 2. Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee, reportedly charges as much as $115,000 for engagements.

But OMG a Bill a great speaker got paid

Paid speaking is nothing more than a loophole for bribery.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you can't see the difference?

the two that you mentioned did/do so as private citizens

the Clinton Crime Syndicate does so under the guise of public service and charity while railing against many of those that pay them lucrative fees and even for some looking for government benefits and contracts

good grief....

As did bill and Hillary as private citizens ... were to you get your Info?

http://fortune.com/2016/01/23/hillar...goldman-sachs/

wake up dude :spin:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bill-...inglePage=true

"After his wife became Secretary of State, former President Bill Clinton began to collect speaking fees that often doubled or tripled what he had been charging earlier in his post White House years, bringing in millions of dollars from groups that included several with interests pending before the State Department, an ABC News review of financial disclosure records shows"

The former president collected large payments from companies with global interests such Canada’s TD Bank, which had an interest in the Keystone Pipeline, a subject of intense lobbying in Washington. In just one week in March of 2011, Clinton collected $1.3 million giving speeches in Nigeria, Brazil and Grand Cayman.

One instance where the State Department did raise questions about a speech recipient came in 2012, when President Clinton requested to speak at an aviation conference sponsored in part by an organization called the Shanghai Airport Authority. The audience was billed as “6,000 business leaders, government officials, and high net worth individuals.” The State Department ethics officer, Kathryn Youel Page, flagged the request in an email back to the former president’s office indicating the sponsor had ties to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) government.(Hey LOOK - COMMUNISTS)

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...nghazi/396182/

man...just think of the fees Bill will be able to collect for speaking when Shill is president and he can shake down every company and foreign interest looking for corporate welfare and government "investments"....not to mention hitting every intern in sight.....amazing


I guess they're admired in a Bonnie and Clyde sort of way.....

why do righties only hate ... The law of supply and demand in a free-market society. when it applies to the clintons oh wait yet another conspiracy theory the clintons are "

shake down every company and foreign interest looking for corporate welfare and government "investments".

ugh......:sleeps:

what exactly is "free market" about this?...

"After his wife became Secretary of State, former President Bill Clinton began to collect speaking fees that often doubled or tripled what he had been charging earlier in his post White House years, bringing in millions of dollars from groups that included several with interests pending before the State Department, an ABC News review of financial disclosure records shows"

All out in the open who paid him and how much .. So unless you can show and prove quid pro quo if you do can please do.. if not its just another conspiracy

is it?

It's all out in the open because it's a loophole. This is bribery, plain and simple.

"Wait... You can bribe us, but let's make it so you can get a tax deduction on the bribe". It's so simple no one notices
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it's exactly what complains about in every speech....special interests, rich and powerful using their influence to enrich themselves and their cronies as she decries income inequality wearing a $12,000 Armani jacket....just precious...

and since when do Progressive Democrats cite "free market" as something they favor? The idea that peddling influence through government connections(particularly those of your wife) to amass huge amounts of wealth packed away in a phony "charitable organization" which does little more than create high paying jobs for clingers on as your wife runs for president railing against all of this...tells you we are in a very sorry state...not very "Presidential"...but exactly what you'd expect from Bonnie and Clyde

hey Eben, did you get an invite to Bernie's new luxury vacation home yet?

Bernies home that was paid for with proceeds from the sale of their Maine vacation house that Jane inherited ?



No.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It's amaszing that the people do not include the clintons in the 1%...then again if it were not for the rich(1%) we would not B working....take Mark zuckerberg, he is in the 1% employs over12,600 people....I'm sure some have bought new cars, a house...it's not all bad being in the 1%, take spence for instance, he would not B able to buy them armanian suits if not for the 1%......lol.....:)

https://www.yahoo.com/news/gop-asks-...140731895.html
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

if it were not for the rich(1%) we would not B working.


you really dont get it do you....

look what a worker got paid and what a company made .. in the 50 60s early 70s it started to shift in the 80s it was symbiotic relationship between the 2

not now that model has left the building.. the ratio to wages and profit are out of balance... you cant see that is the real issue today for todays workers

https://www.yahoo.com/news/grassley-...-election.html

https://www.yahoo.com/news/chaffetz-...014137939.html
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Haven't owned anything Armani in years, hate the shoulder and the lack of structure.

So the 80's were the symbiotic "balance"? So Reaganomics was the proper "model"? Tell that to Hillary and the Democrats. Imagine that, it was a small sliver in time that we had "balance."

And now we are out of balance. The apocalypse!

Maybe different folks have different "interpretations" of balance. But, no worry, Hillary and the Progressives will give us the real and true symbiotic balance. They will determine wages and profits. And pretty much everything else. We will be, finally, in total balance. Including that unimportant non-issue that fanatic, conspiracy driven right wingers keep pestering the rest of us with--the proper balance in the relationship of citizen to government. But let us not get into a discussion of that apocalypse infested topic. The Progressives will relegate it to the non-issue that it truly is.

[QUOTE=wdmso;1106596]if it were not for the rich(1%) we would not B working.


you really dont get it do you....

look what a worker got paid and what a company made .. in the 50 60s early 70s it started to shift in the 80s it was symbiotic relationship between the 2

I do get it, UUUUUUU may not.
Apparently UUUUUU do not own a business, I was in business for 40 years kept 10-12 men working. So U R saying I should not have made a profit and try to B a millionaire by retirement. U say maybe I should have split profits with the help, U must believe in equality, if U do please send me half your paycheck I'm on social now, a biscuit ticket. And by the way my first hourly pay in 1969 was $1.10. If the average person today is living from paycheck to paycheck will most likely not make.....:)