Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/index.php)
-   Political Threads (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=66)
-   -   Hilary email (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/showthread.php?t=89879)

spence 01-22-2016 06:01 PM

The fundamental lack of understanding you guys have over this topic is most certainly mind boggling.

Nebe 01-22-2016 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1091743)
The fundamental lack of understanding you guys have over this topic is most certainly mind boggling.

Worst of all, bill had a ton of Asian tentacle porn on the server
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

ecduzitgood 01-22-2016 06:40 PM

This is who the Democrats want to run the country.
http://radaronline.com/celebrity-new...evenue-grants/
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence 01-22-2016 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ecduzitgood (Post 1091746)
This is who the Democrats want to run the country.
http://radaronline.com/celebrity-new...evenue-grants/
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

See, this is why the Internet sucks.

The Clinton foundation doesn't use the vast majority of it's funding for grants, instead it funds charity activities directly because they can get more benefit value for the dollar.

Yet people can write this crap and many just lap it up without any regard for the truth.

scottw 01-22-2016 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1091743)
The fundamental lack of understanding you guys have over this topic is most certainly mind boggling.

I know right??...everyone is an idiot and your steadfast defense of a reprobate is perfectly normal :kewl: something else is quite mind boggling :hee:

ecduzitgood 01-22-2016 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1091748)
See, this is why the Internet sucks.

The Clinton foundation doesn't use the vast majority of it's funding for grants, instead it funds charity activities directly because they can get more benefit value for the dollar.

Yet people can write this crap and many just lap it up without any regard for the truth.

So set me straight with some facts over how efficient the foundation is and how it isn't a gravy train for the Clintons. Scandals seem to surround these people that you try and portray as honorable and the beat choice to run the country.
I would be embarrassed to support someone who behaves the way they do.
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/klayman/130126
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

And remember when McCain was too old to be president well judging how Hillary is just as old as he was the difference must be the vagina.

spence 01-22-2016 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1091749)
I know right??...everyone is an idiot and your steadfast defense of a reprobate is perfectly normal :kewl: something else is quite mind boggling :hee:

In this case...yes, that may be the case.

scottw 01-22-2016 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1091751)
In this case...yes, that may be the case.

"your steadfast defense of a reprobate is perfectly normal"


this part anyway:hee:

buckman 01-22-2016 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1091748)
See, this is why the Internet sucks.

The Clinton foundation doesn't use the vast majority of it's funding for grants, instead it funds charity activities directly because they can get more benefit value for the dollar.

Yet people can write this crap and many just lap it up without any regard for the truth.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm more concerned with who they get the money from
Through 2014 the foundation had raised almost $2 billion from U.S. corporations especially Wall Street; foreign governments and corporations...
No corruption there , I'm sure of it .
Why the duck would you give them the money over other charities ?

JohnR 01-22-2016 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1091743)
The fundamental lack of understanding you guys have over this topic is most certainly mind boggling.

I don't know, you have IT guys and guys with security clearances and IT guys with security clearances all telling you what she did was illegal and unsecure, yet the strategic messaging guy does not want believe it could possibly be true.

The Dad Fisherman 01-23-2016 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1091687)
I've not hear anyone claim it was hacked although it's certainly possible.

The mark of a good hacker is the ability to get in, do what you need to do, and get out without anybody ever knowing you were there.

She bypassed security....end of discussion.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The Dad Fisherman 01-23-2016 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1091743)
The fundamental lack of understanding you guys have over this topic is most certainly mind boggling.

Wow......just Wow...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 01-23-2016 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnR (Post 1091758)
yet the strategic messaging guy does not want believe it could possibly be true.

he knows it's true, the strategic message is more important than the truth in every case

spence 01-23-2016 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnR (Post 1091758)
I don't know, you have IT guys and guys with security clearances and IT guys with security clearances all telling you what she did was illegal and unsecure, yet the strategic messaging guy does not want believe it could possibly be true.

Good plan, when you need sound legal council...call tech support.

spence 01-23-2016 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckman (Post 1091753)
Why the duck would you give them the money over other charities ?

Because Bill Clinton is a rock star and rich people like to be affiliated with his work.

spence 01-23-2016 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ecduzitgood (Post 1091750)
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/klayman/130126
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

And remember when McCain was too old to be president well judging how Hillary is just as old as he was the difference must be the vagina.

You forgot about Vince Foster.

That article was written by a founder of Judicial Watch, a fake think tank who's primary purpose is to use FOIA requests to take government records out of context and smear democrats.

I'll bet he's great at parties though.

spence 01-23-2016 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justplugit (Post 1091693)
Agree, we will have to wait, however being she said the only reason she used
her own server was for her convenience, used only for personal reasons, wedding plans etc. and NEVER contained classified info, she still deleted 34,000 e mails while 1300 others were reported classified and 4 reported top secret.
She is a serial liar and how can she be trusted when she changes her story?
Does she know what integrity is?

Funny you list a string of things that are not true then allege she's a liar.

Irony or humor?

spence 01-23-2016 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DZ (Post 1091701)
Whether she put the emails on the server or someone else did is not the issue. She as head of the DOS is ultimately responsible for what is on the server. In government responsibility goes up the chain of the command and blame often goes down the chain. Think about how many department heads over the years were forced to resign when something happened on their watch even though they were not directly responsible.

What is troubling to me is that her campaign continues to state that there is no FBI investigation about her server or emails at all. I'm stumped by that.

If it was revealed that her use of the private server led to some calamity there would likely be some fallout, but to date there isn't any evidence of this.

They don't say there's no FBI investigation, it's that Clinton is not a target of a criminal investigation. This was wrongly reported I think by the NYTimes and just repeated over and over by FOX and all the fake news sites...

JohnR 01-23-2016 01:38 PM

Spence - Keep telling yourself it is a vast RWC :laughs::doh:

ecduzitgood 01-23-2016 01:39 PM

So spence give me reasons why I should vote for Hillary. Seriously, unless you just like to stir the pot.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

detbuch 01-23-2016 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1091788)
If it was revealed that her use of the private server led to some calamity there would likely be some fallout, but to date there isn't any evidence of this.

Makes you wonder why they issue speeding tickets even if the speeding didn't lead to a calamity.

This was wrongly reported I think by the NYTimes , , , and all the other fake news sites...

Fixed,

spence 01-23-2016 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1091791)
Fixed,

Um, speeding is illegal...according to the DOJ her use of the server and to delete private emails wasn't.

ecduzitgood 01-23-2016 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ecduzitgood (Post 1091790)
So spence give me reasons why I should vote for Hillary. Seriously, unless you just like to stir the pot.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Am I on your block list or do you have nothing to offer to sway people see what you see in Hillary?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

justplugit 01-23-2016 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1091786)
Funny you list a string of things that are not true then allege she's a liar.

Irony or humor?

Neither Spence,it is the truth and the furthest thing from funny.
Unless you are living in a different universe you would know the list is the truth.
Please list the facts that counter the list I posted.
I would like to see your truth and sources.

The Dad Fisherman 01-23-2016 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1091788)
If it was revealed that her use of the private server led to some calamity there would likely be some fallout, but to date there isn't any evidence of this.
.

Kinda like making it home driving Chit-faced....No harm, No Foul.

Pretty sure it's still illegal.....or at the very least irresponsible.

And at the very least I shouldn't be allowed to be in charge of the van pool...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

detbuch 01-23-2016 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1091813)
Kinda like making it home driving Chit-faced....No harm, No Foul.

Pretty sure it's still illegal.....or at the very least irresponsible.

And at the very least I shouldn't be allowed to be in charge of the van pool...And
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Sounds like Spence believes it's OK to do wrong stupid stuff as long as calamity doesn't happen (or if it does, you can blame it on something else like a video). And if you're prone to do questionable, wrong, stupid, stuff, so long as no calamities are proved to happen as a result, you're a perfectly fine candidate for President of the U.S.

Most of us are taught not to do stupid stuff because bad things can happen if we do--even though most of the time we are fortunate enough to avoid calamity. But the more responsibility that we are given, the more strictly we must perform the right and prudent way. Wanton, wilful, carelessness should disqualify someone from positions of power over the lives of others.

Slipknot 01-23-2016 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1091822)
Sounds like Spence believes it's OK to do wrong stupid stuff as long as calamity doesn't happen (or if it does, you can blame it on something else like a video). And if you're prone to do questionable, wrong, stupid, stuff, so long as no calamities are proved to happen as a result, you're a perfectly fine candidate for President of the U.S.

Most of us are taught not to do stupid stuff because bad things can happen if we do--even though most of the time we are fortunate enough to avoid calamity. But the more responsibility that we are given, the more strictly we must perform the right and prudent way. Wanton, wilful, carelessness should disqualify someone from positions of power over the lives of others.

Yep
Typical Democrat
Just like blaming things on someone or something else taking no responsibility

This attitude and moral weakness is killing this country among other things
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Fly Rod 01-24-2016 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1091788)
If it was revealed that her use of the private server led to some calamity there would likely be some fallout, but to date there isn't any evidence of this.
...

Spence....Petraeus sent 2 emails to the lady friend, they did not cause any damage, or any disaster....so Y is he punished and not her....I know Y, she is the Affluenza lady....:)

JohnR 01-24-2016 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1091813)
Kinda like making it home driving Chit-faced....No harm, No Foul.

Pretty sure it's still illegal.....or at the very least irresponsible.

And at the very least I shouldn't be allowed to be in charge of the van pool...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Good analogy.

Well, except we are fairly certain that other foreign governments were reading the emails of the SECRETARY OF STATE.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slipknot (Post 1091823)
Yep
Typical Democrat
Just like blaming things on someone or something else taking no responsibility

This attitude and moral weakness is killing this country among other things
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That is not a "democrat" thing, yes some democrats do it, and the Rs do it to a lesser extent too. All political persuasions do so at some point and level.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fly Rod (Post 1091830)
Spence....Petraeus sent 2 emails to the lady friend, they did not cause any damage, or any disaster....so Y is he punished and not her....I know Y, she is the Affluenza lady....:)

Petraeus shared his password with Broadwell (and she had a general security clearance)

ecduzitgood 01-24-2016 11:38 AM

Speaking of passwords what do you think Hillary used for a password?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com