Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/index.php)
-   Political Threads (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=66)
-   -   I did not vote for Trump (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/showthread.php?t=93431)

Jim in CT 03-03-2018 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Got Stripers (Post 1138693)
I don't think his own party has the stomach for another term of crazy fly by the seat of your pants policy decisions; the proposed tariff without any brainstorming with his own party or a panel of economists with brains and a clear understanding of the implications is the perfect example.

I'm all for looking at some new gun legislation, no what a minute I forgot I have a meeting with my NRA chums, can I get back to you on that one.

No offense to the women reading this, but this nut job is locked in a constant state of menopause, he doesn't know if he is coming or going on policy decisions. But we do know his staff is for the most part going.

His party, for the most part, is ecsatic with most of his results.

"the proposed tariff without any brainstorming"

That wasn't his best moment.

"he doesn't know if he is coming or going on policy decisions. "

He does on the economy, and with dealing with ISIS.

wdmso 03-03-2018 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1138697)
Yeah, let's not remember trampling on the religious freedom of Christians, Fast & Furious, Benghazi, the IRS targeting conservatives, the utter failure of Obamacare to lower costs or let people keep their doctors...we were worried about his wardrobe.

HOW MANY PEOPLE IN THOSE 8 YEARS WERE CHARGED WITH A CRIME OR PLEAD GUILTY TO A CRIME ZERO

YOU really need to ditch your worn out talking points and focus on who's in the Whitehouse .. and the current guilty tally and other real issues

Pete F. 03-03-2018 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1138698)
His party, for the most part, is ecsatic with most of his results.
The qualifying word there is some, even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while

"the proposed tariff without any brainstorming"

That wasn't his best moment.
Ya think

"he doesn't know if he is coming or going on policy decisions. "

He does on the economy, and with dealing with ISIS.

He walked into a growing economy reduced taxes and increased the deficit
Let’s see how that works in the long run
Isis was boxed into a couple of cities already, do you honestly think Trump is capable of understanding the dynamics of Al Queda, Isis the Kurds, Syria Turkey and the rest of the Middle East
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Nebe 03-03-2018 07:38 PM

And his ties are still made in China. Fing hypocrite.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

zimmy 03-03-2018 08:12 PM

He won because of a small shift in voting and new voters who bought into he would bring manufacturing jobs back, fix healthcare, improve the economies of the small towns. He instead cut taxes for the guys in NYC and Greenwich with deficit spending with policy that will drive inflation and those people in rural Western PA will see pennies. The guys in Trump shirts with their drum sticks in their hands are gonna vote for him no matter what. Not sure sea to shining sea will be lined with Trump signs in 2 years
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence 03-04-2018 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnR (Post 113824)
Some of the things Trump has done I have been in favor of, some of the things not

Which list does the recent tariff announcement go on? :rotf2:

Got Stripers 03-04-2018 02:41 PM

Trump loves China now has a ruler for life and apparently feels the US might go that way in the future, does that comment bother anyone? His warm and fuzzy feelings for other world authoritarian leaders and attacks on our own DOJ and FBI is telling.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F. 03-04-2018 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Got Stripers (Post 1138745)
Trump loves China now has a ruler for life and apparently feels the US might go that way in the future, does that comment bother anyone? His warm and fuzzy feelings for other world authoritarian leaders and attacks on our own DOJ and FBI is telling.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Slip might be right we might all need more powerful weapons
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

detbuch 03-04-2018 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1138663)
Intent.

What did she intend?

spence 03-05-2018 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1138771)
What did she intend?

That's exactly the point.

The Dad Fisherman 03-05-2018 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1138771)
What did she intend?

Intent is the buzz word that let her slide on lack of Professional Responsibility and Common Sense.

detbuch 03-05-2018 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1138791)
Intent is the buzz word that let her slide on lack of Professional Responsibility and Common Sense.

Bingo!!

Her "intent" in the use of a private server rather than the professionally responsible use of the department server is left open to question. And her answer is even more questionable. At best, it is, as you say, professionally irresponsible. At worst, it has the strong appearance of avoiding transparency, of hiding intentions which she would rather not be known.

Sea Dangles 03-05-2018 12:52 PM

In other words,she is so stupid that she sacrificed security without really intending to do so.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wdmso 03-07-2018 04:54 AM

Another one heading for the exit


White House Economic Adviser Gary Cohn Quits


But trumps staff guilt pleas and security clearances and staff quitting 4 ambushed in nigier every weekend in maro largo travel expenses of staff POTUS for life still better .. than Hillary emails ....

Nebe 03-07-2018 07:24 AM

Another rat jumps ship before it explodes in flames and sinks leaving a smoldering oil slick of floating cheato grease
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

JohnR 03-07-2018 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles (Post 1138805)
In other words,she is so stupid that she sacrificed security without really intending to do so.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device


Nahhh - she knew EXACTLY what she was doing. The Most Qualified Person in History to be President was doing this to keep stuff hidden from others ans to cover her ass if she got caught. So yes, she intended

spence 03-07-2018 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnR (Post 1138955)
Nahhh - she knew EXACTLY what she was doing. The Most Qualified Person in History to be President was doing this to keep stuff hidden from others ans to cover her ass if she got caught. So yes, she intended

I can't believe you guys are still fixated on Clinton's emails :rollem:

Nebe 03-07-2018 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1138958)
I can't believe you guys are still fixated on Clinton's emails :rollem:

Proof that brainwashing works.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

PaulS 03-07-2018 08:53 AM

If the only news coming out of the WH was a single resignation, that should be considered a good day for Pres. Trump.

No angry tweets, no words or praise for Putin (or vice versa), no law suits, no new arrests, no news how the Trump family continues to use the WH for personal gain, no news on people co-operating w/Mueller, no news on sex scandals or talk of officials beating their wives.

The Dad Fisherman 03-07-2018 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1138958)
I can't believe you guys are still fixated on Clinton's emails :rollem:

Why do you keep bringing it up?

spence 03-07-2018 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1138962)
Why do you keep bringing it up?

RR brought it up.

The Dad Fisherman 03-07-2018 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1138964)
RR brought it up.

Actually he just mentioned putting her in prison, you're the one that assumed he was talking about e-mails.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raider Ronnie (Post 1138661)
If they haven’t locked up Hillary by now it’s not possible to lock up anyone in Washington.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device


JohnR 03-07-2018 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1138958)
I can't believe you guys are still fixated on Clinton's emails :rollem:


Once a Crook...

spence 03-07-2018 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1138967)
Actually he just mentioned putting her in prison, you're the one that assumed he was talking about e-mails.

Usually that is the context.

Pete F. 03-07-2018 10:55 AM

I couldn't bring myself to vote for either one of the last mainstream presidential candidates, but when people start with the "But Hillarys" I wonder if they let their children get away with things because Johnny did something worse and he didn't get in trouble.

detbuch 03-07-2018 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1138971)
I couldn't bring myself to vote for either one of the last mainstream presidential candidates, but when people start with the "But Hillarys" I wonder if they let their children get away with things because Johnny did something worse and he didn't get in trouble.

That's why it's important not to let Hilla . . . er . . . Johnny get away with his shenanigans . . . precedent begets repetition.

Pete F. 03-07-2018 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1138983)
That's why it's important not to let Hilla . . . er . . . Johnny get away with his shenanigans . . . precedent begets repetition.

Would that be like the Mexican repatriation?
J Edgar Hoover
Or maybe Trumps buddy, Roy Cohn
Or which of the many political faux pas would you like to prosecute former politicians for?

detbuch 03-07-2018 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1138984)
Would that be like the Mexican repatriation?
J Edgar Hoover
Or maybe Trumps buddy, Roy Cohn
Or which of the many political faux pas would you like to prosecute former politicians for?

If they were prosecuted in the first place, not allowed to be gotten away with, there would be no need to bring them up as a sort of "but Hillary" meme. They would not be precedents that you could use to let your child get away with wrongdoing.

Hillary getting away with her shenanigans can be used as a precedent you can use to excuse your children's transgressions, just as her husband's sexual deviations gave many children excuses to do the same. And yes, that applies to letting other malfeasances go unpunished.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com