lawmakers' failure to appreciate Me
1 Attachment(s)
http://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-...nd-un-american
His followers see him as he sees himself. as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA in a physical form,, move over Uncle Sam (your Fired ) |
WDMSO, a compelling case can be made that the Democrats (in the Obama administration, at the Justice Dept, and in the Clinton campaign) conspired to use the FBI in an attempt to help ensure a Hilary victory.
Trey Gowdy said exactly that, and you were the one who brought him up and suggested that his opinions on the dossier were valid. So if there's evidence of that kind of collusion, how do you expect Trump to react, exactly? If it's true, it's a big deal. We know that Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton privately on a jet while his wife was under investigation. We know that shortly after that meeting, Hilary was exonerated. We know that immediately after that exoneration, Hilary said that if she won, she might keep Lynch on as AG. if that's not quid pro quo, nothing is. We know that the FBI deemed the Steele dossier to be salacious and unverified, yet they used it as support for the FISA warrant. We know that Trey Gowdy says that the warrant would not have been issued without the dossier. And since Gowdy also conceded that the Mueller investigation would have proceeded without the dossier, it's not like Gowdy will say anything to get Trump off the hook. We know that the deputy attorney general has a wife that works at Fusion, the company hired by team Clinton to prepare the dossier. He never disclosed this and did not recuse himself. We know that the deputy director of the FBI (McCabe) had a wife who ran for the senate and took a ton of money from Clinton pals. He did not disclose this and he did not recuse himself. We know there were 2 FBI agents involved in the Clinton email investigation who were desperate for Clinton to win. They did not disclose this and they did not recuse themselves. We also have the DNC conspiring to rig the primary for Clinton, and CNN giving her debate questions ahead of time. Is any of that not true? Is there one syllable I typed that's not true? During the campaign, Trump alleged that his team was being wiretapped, and everyone said he was insane and everyone mocked him. Turns out he was right. I'm not sure I'd say they are treasonous. But they certainly aren't huge fans of democracy, which is precisely why your side engages in mob violence every single time they don't get their way, and conservatives never do that. Your side may re-take the house in November. Or they may pay dearly for their shenanigans. I'm not sure how much lower they can sink than where they are at this moment (losers who lost despite the fact that they didn't play by the rules). We'll see. In any event, Trump, for all his many faults, certainly has a legitimate gripe here. I cannot believe anyone is so unwilling to criticize their own side, that they would refuse to concede that there were some shady dealings. You and Spence and Paul S, you have no problem with any of this? Seriously? As I said, the democrats actually have put Trump in a place where he can accurately portray himself as a sympathetic victim. Well done, kudos to them. |
Jim, if the FBI was conspiring to help Clinton she would have won.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's the best you got? She didn't win, therefore you conclude that there could not possibly have been cheating? Do you hear yourself? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If the public is convinced that there was collusion, that, combined with larger paychecks and larger IRA balances, isn't going to help your side in November. How much more marginalized does the DNC want to be? How many more seats are they trying to lose? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
but you went old school you went Clinton .. and completely off topic This fits what I have said for some time its all about him !!!! and when not properly stroked he Goes off .... you want us to Admit shady dealings !!! 1st for things that are not under Investigation that are conjecture at best and it the democrats fault that actually have put Trump in a place where he can accurately portray himself as a sympathetic victim.. If Trump would only say and do the things he has done while wearing an Obama Mask... I could only imagine how your Tune would change |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Clinton paid for the dossier. So it's current and on topic. "its all about him" He was the one that was colluded against. So if the victim speaks out, you accuse them of being self-centered. "you want us to Admit shady dealings " If appropriate, yes . "1st for things that are not under Investigation" Not yet. "conjecture at best" Funny, you were the one who brought up Trey Gowdy, who agrees with me. "If Trump would only say and do the things he has done while wearing an Obama Mask... I could only imagine how your Tune would change" I have said many, many times I don't like Trump. That doesn't mean he's not correct when he cries foul here. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
How about this Spence. When you can explain why it makes any sense at all, to believe that failure to win necessarily means one played by the rules, I will listen to what you have to say. You are humiliating yourself. The Japanese lost WWII, correct? Using your logic, does that mean they committed no war crimes? After all, they lost! If they were cheating, according to you, they would have been victorious! |
US President Donald Trump has asked the Pentagon to organise a large military parade in the nation's capital.
Nationalism being masked in patriotism |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...County.svg.png |
Quote:
The map is pretty though. |
Quote:
You people have come completely, and I mean completely, unglued. We have people in harm's way. Honoring them with a parade, is an ominous sign of nationalism? I have a better idea, let's have another liberal march on The Mall where bitter losers scream the f word into megaphones and then leave the place littered with trash and cigarette butts. That's what we really need, not a parade. |
Quote:
Conspiracy theories? I listed the facts. I asked you if any of them was wrong, and you didn't claim a single one was wrong. Hmm, I wonder why? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Thank God for those highly educated folks in Calif. who help fund all those red areas.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's a fantastic waste of money. |
Quote:
A rare point of agreement. "It's a fantastic waste of money" A parade? You're a deficit hawk now? Or only when a Republican is spending money? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com