Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/index.php)
-   Political Threads (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=66)
-   -   Hillary Email issues (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/showthread.php?t=90335)

JohnR 03-29-2016 11:03 PM

Hillary Email issues
 
Pretty well run down track of issues.

Pour a large Coffee, put the phone on silent, and give a read.

https://informedvote2016.wordpress.c...ted-full-form/

buckman 03-30-2016 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnR (Post 1097637)
Pretty well run down track of issues.

Pour a large Coffee, put the phone on silent, and give a read.

https://informedvote2016.wordpress.c...ted-full-form/

Some surprising information here . Even for those of us that fully expected a cover up .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence 03-30-2016 05:44 AM

Don't see anything in here that hasn't been brought up before.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 03-30-2016 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1097642)

Don't see anything.....


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

not surprising information

spence 03-30-2016 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1097645)
not surprising information

I do find it interesting that John would take the opinion of a 22 year old who honed his skills in high school debate club over real journalists talking to legal experts. Hey, he's a decent writer but please.

scottw 03-30-2016 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1097651)
I do find it interesting that John would take the opinion of a 22 year old who honed his skills in high school debate club over real journalists talking to legal experts. Hey, he's a decent writer but please.

so you ignored the content and dismissed it because of the age (and probably angle) of the writer...

"real journalists"...that's funny too


too much comedy

buckman 03-30-2016 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1097651)
I do find it interesting that John would take the opinion of a 22 year old who honed his skills in high school debate club over real journalists talking to legal experts. Hey, he's a decent writer but please.

He didn't take the opinion he posted the story and it's not a debate it's an FBI investigation
What real journalist are you referring too BTW ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

JohnR 03-30-2016 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1097651)
I do find it interesting that John would take the opinion of a 22 year old who honed his skills in high school debate club over real journalists talking to legal experts. Hey, he's a decent writer but please.

Haha - even a 22 year old (that has had security training) is able to look up sources.

Bu that is OK, almost 150 FBI agents have been working this case at times, surely there is nothing to see
/sarc


Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1097642)
Don't see anything in here that hasn't been brought up before.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripert...2&d=1375401049

scottw 03-30-2016 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnR (Post 1097658)

But that is OK, almost 150 FBI Secret agents have been working this case at times, surely there is nothing to see

fixed it :kewl:

it is government...maybe only 1 or 2 are actually working the case and the rest are standing around in bright yellow pinnies sipping coffee ??

seems to me if ANYONE at the FBI is looking into you or your activities, particularly if you are running around telling everyone you want to be President...there's probably something to see

buckman 03-30-2016 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1097659)
fixed it :kewl:

it is government...maybe only 1 or 2 are actually working the case and the rest are standing around in bright yellow pinnies sipping coffee ??

seems to me if ANYONE at the FBI is looking into you or your activities, particularly if you are running around telling everyone you want to be President...there's probably something to see

Exactly! Spence and Paul would be having simultaneous orgasms if the FBI were investigating Donald Trump for parking violations .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence 03-30-2016 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnR (Post 1097658)
Haha - even a 22 year old (that has had security training) is able to look up sources.

Bu that is OK, almost 150 FBI agents have been working this case at times, surely there is nothing to see

"Sources" are people with inside knowledge, not blogs.

Your 147 number just blew up by the way, WashPost retracted that reporting...

scottw 03-30-2016 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence;1097664

"Sources" are people with inside knowledge, ...

"Special" Sources

scottw 03-30-2016 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1097664)

Your 147 number just blew up by the way, WashPost retracted that reporting..

"Sources" (people with inside knowledge) were wrong?

PaulS 03-30-2016 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckman (Post 1097663)
Exactly! Spence and Paul would be having simultaneous orgasms if the FBI were investigating Donald Trump for parking violations .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

nah, I'm not infatuated with him (although I do think his campaign is a joke) and haven't posted as much as I'm guessing you seem to think I've posted. You have been posting far more than me about him. But since you mention Trump, did you see the stories saying there is a strong correlation of his support and number of racist web searches by state. Some people said that the measure was the single strongest correlation of Trump that they could find.

How is that?

JohnR 03-30-2016 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1097664)
"Sources" are people with inside knowledge, not blogs.

Your 147 number just blew up by the way, WashPost retracted that reporting...

Ya know - you are correct, the frequently rumored 147 (which has been the number circulated for weeks) has been retracted to less than 50 agents by WaPo for the WaPo article.

Quote:

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article incorrectly said that Clinton used two different email addresses, sometimes interchangeably, as secretary of state. She used only hdr22@clintonemail.com as secretary of state. Also, an earlier version of this article reported that 147 FBI agents had been detailed to the investigation, according to a lawmaker briefed by FBI Director James B. Comey. Two U.S. law enforcement officials have since told The Washington Post that figure is too high. The FBI will not provide an exact figure, but the officials say the number of FBI personnel involved is fewer than 50.
So that means that the FBI agents on this case is less than those working on the September 11 Attacks, but more than worked on TWA 800.

BTW - did you read the article?

Raider Ronnie 03-30-2016 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1097651)
I do find it interesting that John would take the opinion of a 22 year old who honed his skills in high school debate club over real journalists talking to legal experts. Hey, he's a decent writer but please.



"Real journalist"

That's a good one.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

buckman 03-30-2016 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1097670)
nah, I'm not infatuated with him (although I do think his campaign is a joke) and haven't posted as much as I'm guessing you seem to think I've posted. You have been posting far more than me about him. But since you mention Trump, did you see the stories saying there is a strong correlation of his support and number of racist web searches by state. Some people said that the measure was the single strongest correlation of Trump that they could find.

How is that?

No i didn't see that but I suspect a large portion of them could be liberals reaching for a smoking gun
Please post your source. I would love to read it and also I could use a good laugh
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

PaulS 03-30-2016 10:00 AM

Look up Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight. Didn't read the study but I know he is well regarded.

I guess one reaction would be to laugh.

Jim in CT 03-30-2016 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1097676)
Look up Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight. Didn't read the study but I know he is well regarded.

I guess one reaction would be to laugh.

If I had to bet which candidate actual racists support, I'd pick Trump. And if I had to bet which party ISIS hopes wins, it would be the Democrats. So I'm not sure you can use this to make the point you are trying to make.

The media and the Dems have done a wonderful job making the GOP out to be racist. The ironic thing is, it's the Democratic agenda that has been a disaster for blacks (I refer you to any urban area controlled by the Dems for 40 years, and do a before and after comparison). If I was a racist, I would absolutely vote for Dems, whose agenda is to treat blacks like pets, pat them on the head and say "there, there", give them just enough to avoid death, but not nearly enough to climb out of poverty.

Republicans want all blacks to succeed. Democrats want blacks to "behave", meaning, to vote for Democrats and to not move into wealthy, liberal, white neighborhoods. Because if blacks escaped poverty in huge numbers, they'd have no need to keep voting for Dems.

spence 03-30-2016 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1097679)
And if I had to bet which party ISIS hopes wins, it would be the Democrats.

This makes no sense.

spence 03-30-2016 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnR (Post 1097671)
Ya know - you are correct, the frequently rumored 147 (which has been the number circulated for weeks) has been retracted to less than 50 agents by WaPo for the WaPo article.



So that means that the FBI agents on this case is less than those working on the September 11 Attacks, but more than worked on TWA 800.

BTW - did you read the article?

Yes, I read just about everything.

Jim in CT 03-30-2016 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1097680)
This makes no sense.

To you, I'm sure it doesn't make sense. In all seriousness, when was the last time you were able to process something that made Democrats look like they were on the wrong side of an issue? I mean that, when was the last time? You won't admit that Hilary lies. So it's no surprise that this makes no sense.

To ISIS, the dems are seen as softer on terror and crime. Maybe you followed the issue of waterboarding, and what the 2 parties had to say on the subject. Eric Holder put forth the idea that terrorists captured on the battlefield should be mirandized (and after everyone in Congress got done laughing at that, they told him to run along and go play on the swings). Obama pulled us out of Iraq, which allowed ISIS to step up.

buckman 03-30-2016 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1097676)
Look up Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight. Didn't read the study but I know he is well regarded.

I guess one reaction would be to laugh.

Couldn't find the study but I found a lot about how Nate totally miised on his predictions about Trump so far . I also couldn't find positive article about Trump written by Nate but I found a lot of negative ones .
He's obviously biased and to be honest not that funny 😁
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence 03-30-2016 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1097683)
To you, I'm sure it doesn't make sense. In all seriousness, when was the last time you were able to process something that made Democrats look like they were on the wrong side of an issue? I mean that, when was the last time? You won't admit that Hilary lies. So it's no surprise that this makes no sense.

To ISIS, the dems are seen as softer on terror and crime. Maybe you followed the issue of waterboarding, and what the 2 parties had to say on the subject. Eric Holder put forth the idea that terrorists captured on the battlefield should be mirandized (and after everyone in Congress got done laughing at that, they told him to run along and go play on the swings). Obama pulled us out of Iraq, which allowed ISIS to step up.

Was does ISIS want?

A) Muslims to feel disenfranchised in their home countries so they leave and come to fight for ISIS

B) Foreign boots on the ground and collateral damage to claim Western imperialism and disregard for Muslims in Syria and Iraq to get money from sympathetic Arabs

What does Trump want?

A) Surveillance of Muslims in America and to restrict free movement based on religion

B) US boots on the ground, torture of Muslims and burn the place down War footing

buckman 03-30-2016 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1097688)
Was does ISIS want?

A) Muslims to feel disenfranchised in their home countries so they leave and come to fight for ISIS

B) Foreign boots on the ground and collateral damage to claim Western imperialism and disregard for Muslims in Syria and Iraq to get money from sympathetic Arabs

What does Trump want?

A) Surveillance of Muslims in America and to restrict free movement based on religion

B) US boots on the ground, torture of Muslims and burn the place down War footing

A) I don't even know what the hell you mean by this , disenfranchised ?
B) But didn't ISIS gain ground and stature after the US boots on the ground were pulled against the recommendation of many ?
You really aren't making much sense lately
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 03-30-2016 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckman (Post 1097689)

You really aren't making much sense lately

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

yup...he's lost it...:screwy:

maybe he needs some of that Trump Derangement Syndrome Therapy

Jim in CT 03-30-2016 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1097688)
Was does ISIS want?

A) Muslims to feel disenfranchised in their home countries so they leave and come to fight for ISIS

B) Foreign boots on the ground and collateral damage to claim Western imperialism and disregard for Muslims in Syria and Iraq to get money from sympathetic Arabs

What does Trump want?

A) Surveillance of Muslims in America and to restrict free movement based on religion

B) US boots on the ground, torture of Muslims and burn the place down War footing

Your list of what ISIS wants, seems to be missing some key htings, which I promise you are on their wishlist. They would prefer a President who isn't going to empty our arsenal of conventional bombs on thei rheads, and they want a President who is less likely to send in th ecavalry to kill them all. Since they also have sa stated goal of killing as many Americans as possible, they would also prefer a President who makes it easier, rather than harder, to get jihadists into the country. Gee, I wonder why you left those things, off your list of what the terrorists want?

"Foreign boots on the ground and collateral damage to claim Western imperialism and disregard for Muslims in Syria and Iraq to get money from sympathetic Arabs "

So if we stop bombing them altogether, which reduces collateral damage to zero, you say that's bad for ISIS? Man, oh man.

Raven 03-30-2016 06:01 PM

an indictment shall follow

spence 03-31-2016 07:28 PM

John, Really????????????????????

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...nquiry-n548026

JohnR 03-31-2016 09:20 PM

It is more than 12, there may also be an investigation with the Clinton Global Initiative. And the NSA is pi$$ed.

Time will tell - looks like she has a date with Director Comey real soon.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com