Santander
 

I'll just put this here for you all

http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/03/2...s-serving-iraq

despite federal law? wtf

Santander sucks!

And you Obama supporters can keep thinking he is the man while he allows this crap to go on
and go ahead and give amnesty to illegal aliens and chit on our troops, makes perfect sense to me :lossinit: :smash:

Lock and Load

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/26/bu...ions.html?_r=0

like I said
santander sucks

Spanish Bank.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm confused. So a private company breaks the law and the Justice Department goes after them.

How does this translate into Obama = bad ?

I don't know, maybe he needs to do his job better and choose his priorities better instead of doing things like allowing this and pissing off Israel etc. on and on, he is in charge right?
the buck stops with him I thought

has he ever seen this?
http://www.defense.gov/specials/Relief_Act_Revision/

really sick of it
if he screws up the Iran nuke thing he should be impeached in my opinion

you keep on making excuses with him, it's ridiculous

I still can't believe he is president

It seems like they continue to break the law

It reports that the activity was primarily between 2008 and 2012. Additionally, I've also read that the DOJ levied fines for illegal mortgage foreclosures on vets of 123 Million to various lenders

It's shameful that service members would have to deal with this or worse, potentially be targeted for it. But I'm still perplexed why something like this would cause such an Obama reaction.

The government appears to be doing what was intended.

Do you think some of our active duty service men and women didn't similar treatment under Bush? I'll bet it was even worse.

Y would this be on Obama's shoulders....further more I would assume that this soldier would have been sending his monthly pay home... not sure if being in Irag he would get combat pay on top of his regular pay.do not know how much he could keep on himself in Irag, in Nam we could only keep 250 bucks a month and rest had to go home and we got an extra 65 bucks a month being in a combat zone...futher more it seems that the wife intentionally did not pay the monthly payment....spent it on other things...

Spence, please stop deflecting and "flying by the seat of your pants" without facts. :D

Blaming Obama for this is like blaming Obama for when the Olive Garden gives you food poisoning. I mean.... He's the head of the FDA RIGHT ?!?!?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Technically yes he is.

You should work at Fox News :cputin:

yep

that Damn Monsanto :smash:

I can blame someone can't I, it's America
Obama blames others all the time

Sorry

I'll go breathe some more paint fumes and work harder for less money

Maybe it's Barney Franks' fault

Do you ever add anything than trying to criticize spence?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Santander was founded in 1857.

They were fined for doing this from 2008 to 2012., I doubt they just started doing this in 2008, they (and more than likely other finance companies) were probably doing this well before that but the law protecting the veterans probably didn't get passed until 2008.

So Yeah, it probably was worse under Bush, but Bush was also in office when this law was passed as Obama wasn't sworn in until 2009. So it looks like Bush/Congress took the steps necessary to rectify the problem on his watch.

I haven't found the exact law to verify when it was signed....I'm just following the timeline.

So blaming Bush for this is just as equally ridiculous as blaming Obama for this.

Or you could just say that it also might have happened during the Bush years .... Possible worse
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Depends how old that cock shrimp tail was......
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You would have to search the forum to find out. :)
Most of what I post to Spence is to get him to do all the work in providing
his facts. :D

Seems like he just ignores the snarky comments.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Considering the number of active duty troops under Bush versus Obama, and the lending spasm that helped with the crash it's only logical to assume there would be significant issues under Bush as well. This shouldn't need foot-notes nor is it an accusation.

It's the super rich's fault that buy politicians with huge contributions and the media that they own. They fool you into thinking the real crooks are the poor and that's where you should place your anger, but in reality it's the 1% who are laughing themselves to the bank.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Evidently you didn't do the forum search. :doh: :D

Agree with you there, Nebe. Each candidate should only be allowed $100
per contribution and each spend the same amount of dollars on election.
Any $ left over, which I doubt,
spent on Vet Programs.

Why do a search? I can see nothing but snarky comments.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Then as I supposed ,you didn't do the search because you couldn't prove your accusations.
If this bothers you so much I would suggest you follow John R's statement about the Forum," If you don't want to see what someone says, don't read it."
Or just ignore me. LOL

Looks like some are still in the winter "nasties." :)

I usually do ignore you, don't I?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Sorry, I never noticed. You seem to take things so seriously.
Lighten up, this forum should be for fun as well as debate, imho.

But be my guest, ignore away, ignore away. :)

Amen
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

yep
that's why I voted for Ross Perot
the rich get richer and the middle class gets poorer

JPI is right, there should be limits and also should get rid of lobbiests

I voted for Perot as well slip!

Bernie sanders seems to be the Perot of today. He's the most vocal about ending the war on the middle class.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Bernie Sanders is no Ross Perot. I'm just saying.