mueller hearing
 

a rout for trump and a flop for
the democrats.

This looks like winning to you?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWiFpxxWFlQ&t=5s

I love it, we now have video of Mueller destroying the no collusion no obstruction mantra and Jim thinks it's a rout. I'll be they're already working on the campaign commercials.

Did you really expect them to portray it as anything else😂
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you guys are right, i don’t know how i missed it. let the impeachment begin. of course ABC news political correspondent Terry Moran says any hope of impeachment is over, but he’s just a trumplican.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

https://m.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=I...&v=RfDBOZwnxXE
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

here’s Mueller really schooling Jim Jordan. He’s really got him on the ropes.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=I...&v=mKSKKLAStK0
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

and Mueller flat-out denied, that the rule
about not indicting a sitting president, played a role in his deciding not to
indict.

The Narrative checked
itself into rehab.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

ABC correspondent says “impeachment is over.”

https://www.foxnews.com/media/abc-ne...ller-testimony
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

anti trump harvard law professor calls hearing a disaster for democrats.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/anti-t...-the-president
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

#winforAmerica
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

not for mueller. he was feeble
and confused about what was in his own report.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Look, all you needed was uniforms to figure which party had the microphone and was on the clock.... Mueller was a dud, or ill.
Dems have to be disappointed.... despite calls from most of the announced 2020 candidates to proceed with impeachment proceedings.
Expecting a slam dunk, they got a face plant..
Trump treated the media to a victory lap... Gave them much more time and sound bites than they expected. See what they do with it. I didn't hear much there for them... And, said the guy who voted against HRC, he (Trump)still makes me sick.


So sick of the divisiveness....

I said earlier that anything but impeachment hearings from this, was a win for trump. Got accused of being the usual trumplican because I didn’t go to the light. :rolleyes:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

These suckers will bite on anything
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Did trump say that ? Sounds about right.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

mueller said very explicitly, that the rule against indicting a sitting president played no role in his decision not to
indict. pretty sure that means he decided not to indict because there wasn’t enough evidence. if that’s the case, this is over.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

He said just the opposite. Are you into Dangles stash?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim read it on his alt right news website. Because it’s real news and not fake news.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

# pissedoffflakes
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Collins: At any time in the investigation was your investigation curtailed or stopped or hindered?

Mueller: No.

earlier.....

Mueller continued:

"Second, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in its election interference activities. We did not address 'collusion,' which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

in the morning. apparently you turned it off a tad early. in the afternoon, he clarified it, and said he was not influenced by pressure to not indict
a sitting potus.

i’m smoking nothing. you’re
smoking obama’s penis as usual.

here you go, Columbo. You’re having a rough go of it, huh?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mue...ndicting-trump
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

read Muellers redaction.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pointless to debate the GOP, for as many great moments and video snippets they can post, we could post as many and more. They will claim it a win, while I see it as proof that while they may not have found evidence of a cordinated effort with the Russians, they welcomed the help to elect their candidate. That doesn’t upset the GOP for some reason, or the multiple instances of obstruction, but spin it just like all the angry GOP I watched question mueller; I’m not buying it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

post whatever you want. Mueller said outside influences didn’t pressured him not to indict. Please tell me how you could possibly spin that, in a way that isn’t a slam dunk for the gop.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it appears that the democrats have stepped on yet another rake :wall:

Looks like CNN ddn't even buy it yesterday.

QUIGLEY: Would it be fair to describe [Wikileaks] as ... a hostile intelligence service?

MUELLER: Yes.

QUIGLEY: If we could put up slide six. “This just came out. WikiLeaks. I love WikiLeaks.'' Donald Trump, Oct. 10, 2016. “This Wikileaks stuff is unbelievable. It tells you the inner heart. You've got to read it.” Donald Trump, Oct. 12, 2016. “This Wikileaks is like a treasure trove.” Donald Trump, October 21, 2016. “Boy, I love reading those WikiLeaks.” Donald Trump, Nov. 4, 2016. Would any of those quotes disturb you, Mr. Director?

...

MUELLER: Well, it's probably—problematic is an understatement in terms of what it displays in terms of giving some, I don't know, hope or some boost to what is and should be illegal activity.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

SCHIFF: From your testimony today I'd gather that you believe that knowingly accepting foreign assistance during a presidential campaign is an unethical thing to do.

...

MUELLER: And a crime, given certain circumstances.

SCHIFF: To the degree that it undermines our democracy and our institutions, we can also agree that it's also unpatriotic.

MUELLER: True

SCHIFF: And wrong.

MUELLER: True.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

One notable feature of the day was that the Republicans essentially accepted the assertions of the Mueller report as factual. By and large, they did not seek to contest the facts Mueller reported, but rather attacked alleged bias and the legal significance of the facts in the document. One of the functions of the report was to establish a common set of facts, and today’s hearing—in its own peculiar way—suggests that it has done that, at least to a point. The Republican members’ questions did not seem to doubt that McGahn was telling the truth and that Trump was lying. They accepted that Trump had asked Corey Lewandowski to get Sessions to unrecuse. While they fought on other matters, they didn’t contest the factual ground that Mueller has staked out.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device