![]() |
Interesting article on Rec Cod Fishing in this morning's Bahstin Globe
Interesting article that everyone should read. There is a lot of valid stuff and a little he said she said and there's even some well I'm gonna take my ball & go home... I have my own beliefs on "what's fair" which are losely based on the data but still open to move when I hear stuff like this....
http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/09..._supply+.shtml Quote:
|
Hey JohnR,
Very interesting article. I do agree that there should be limits on all involved, but I also feel that the destruction of the big nets and draggers hasn't helped either. I personally think they should make it a hook and line fishery and that might prevent alot of the problems in the long run and help sustain the fishery. Just my 2 cents. those big nets take more than just cod in them which the article doesn't happen to mention!!!! If they are all hook and lined fish at least they know if they are legal size and can be released if not, and no other species are harmed. |
I Agree... The only question I have on the hook & line, rec or comm, is that when a cod is caught from very deep water, does it have a good chance of survival when released ?
|
I have been on and seen 6 pack charters where there were a lot of cod taken. I quite frankly don't agree with people keeping that much fish. I like to take some home myself , but 6 fillets are plenty, unless you want to eat fish every day of the week.
Thats an interesting point John. I have seen many come up with their inside coming out of their mouths. |
Specialist - I've seen that too and that's why I wonder about...
I don't think the 6 pack charters should have a loophole with cart blanche access. I think there fares should be subject to the same limits as recs but not necessarily have areas closed to them... That's my take on it... |
JohnR & Specialist, I don't know what would happen with the bladder coming up on the fish, I have seen on some of the fishing show, how they will poke the bladder with a needle and then release the fish. This way the fish will return to the bottom and be OK.
How many fish do you think come up in a big dragger net from deep water and have there bladder in their throat. Also all of the other species that they may be picking up as by catch which end up dead because of all the weight in the net. At least if you are catching one or two at a time you have time to at least puncture the bladder on the smaller fish and then release them. Just my opinion and I am not trying to stop peaple from making a living, but if there is nothing left out there to catch, your not going to make a living that way either. |
If these boats are taking more than commercials can take, I don't think they should be lumped into the recreational sector in terms of blame.
How we define a recreational angler may need to change. If I take my small boat out and catch a few cod in Boston Harbor, how can I be lumped in with these people taking truckloads. And how can I be lumped in with a party boat that can take hundreds of pounds of fish in a few hours. If these six-pack boats and party boats are taking big numbers of fish, than they need limited. If they are taking the same or bigger numbers as commercial guys, then its just as ridiculous. Certainly the dragging does alot more damage. But we brought this up before and I still say 400lbs. from a comm, 400lbs. from a party boat, 400lbs. from a six-pack boat... why is one more acceptable than the other. I have to side with the commercial guy in the respect that you can't limit them just so these so-called "rec" anglers on party boats or charters can load up. That is completely hypocritical. The part I don't get is the private rec boat guy who is already limited to 10, getting cut to 5. How many fish are these people taking? I mean, I'm really asking, I don't know. Are there that many recs out there taking alot of cod? Personally, I hope to learn that near-shore cod fishery a bit this year, but I would only keep a couple fish here and there anyway. 5 is more than I would ever need. But that seems a bit out of whack. You gotta love the loopholes. Why is there always someone there to take advantage of the loopholes for their own personal gain. Greedy. |
Those guys must be selling their fish when they get home. What is anyone going to do with that much cod? And if they're going to freeze it, they might as well eat styrofoam.:mad:
|
I think they should have a 6 pack, party boat category, separate from recs and commercials. Give them their own quotas. They are just as bad. I been on some boat where they have kept shorts, they say just bury it in the bottom.
|
I can't believe they are sqawking about a 15 fish per person limit. What's the word???? Oh yeah greedy. :)
Of course a lot of that fish is sold. Lots of people do freeze it like 100 pounds of cod and 80 lbs of fluke , etc but if you don't believe a lot of that fish is sold , you were born yesterday. So anyway , my opinion is they should have both an increased size and a daily limit. |
I also posted this elswhere. I apologize if it seems redundant...
I think this is another example of why there should be no distinction between a recreational fisherman who fishes from the shore, a private boat, and yes - a charter boat. I am usually one of the first ones to shout when I think that recreational fishermen like myself are getting the shaft. However, to shut down a whole area to commercial fishing only to let charter boats in with a no limit at all is a slap in the face to those who fish for their livelihood. In addition, it helps to delegitimize arguments that the comms created this problem so they should bear the brunt of any new regulation. What I'm trying to say that no matter who created the groundfish problem, it's tough to now blame the comms when charter boats and other sportfishermen account for 1/3 of the codfish take. This article mentions a proposed daily limit of 10-15 fish and the charter guys say that it will "devastate" local businesses like motels and donut shops. I say the only business hurt by such a reduction will be U-Haul because the 90% of out of staters who charter these boats won't need to rent them to bring their cod back to NJ and CT. Ten to fifteen fish is plenty for the freezer especially when it seems that a plausible option could be ZERO if this Conservative Law Foundation has their way. Am I all wet on this? Is the article simply biased? Maybe so. Afterall look at the title and then ask yourself how the other 2/3 of the fish are being caught. Furthermore, one thing this article doesn't mention is the fact that there is virtually no bycatch from the charter folks except maybe for some fish that might die when they are released. |
Cod Fishing
I'm an avid deep sea fisherman, and have seen first hand what operations are like on both commercial and party type fishing boats. What destroyed the fishing economy in the first place was the gill nets, they killed just about everything they came in contact with and ripped up the bottom like a plow removing snow from your street in the winter. Any undersize fish caught in a gill net were usually took damaged to survive, and what's worse is that the lazy or poor fisherman would leave their gill nets out for several days and allow large amounts of fish to spoil in the water.
To give everyone an idea of how this affected the habitat there are still very many "lost" gill nets roaming the bottom of the ocean that continue to kill schools of fish, that because of their composition will never decompose. The resurgence of large catches on hook and line fishing is the product of the banks (georges, tillies, and cashes ledge) being closed to the netters and the populations being allowed to reproduce the way it should happen. It's also illogical to assume that because hook and line fisherman are taking more fish that the population is being harmed because we don't fully understand what the current status of the population of cod is, but we know that it is growing because the schools are denser and located in closer proximity to each other. This is an arguement that is made from jealous commercial fisherman who are upset the cod are returning and they can't get at them, while overlooking the fact that they nearly killed the species off in the north atlantic years ago. To allow netters to go back to their old ways, despite the innovations and regulations on the new "safer" nets would do nothing more than put us back to where we were in the late 1980's and say "okay they're back, go and deplete them again" I'm in favor of larger size limits on Cod and a smaller take for a day, but let's compare apples to apples and see what the real impact commercial fishing has besides just the number of fish they take each trip. |
I agree - but it should be a group effort, just don't exclude the people that didn't create the problem....
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com