Interesting observation about thread titles.
 

I posted a link to a photo series and titled the thread "Some Historic Pictures" (since it was a series of pics of woman in bathing suits in movies going back to 1952). It got 81 hits in over 3 days.

I posted the same link in a thread called "Babes in Bikinis". It got 86 hits in about 7 hours.

Thats about 1 hit per hour for Historic Pics vs 12+ hits per hour for Babes in Bikinis , both to the same link. :)

Now why would that happen I wonder? :devil:

I think the message is clear Chef ruined us!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Just like fishing or making a gormet dinner.. it's all in the presentation...

Try it and name the thread boobies and put a bunch of bird pictures up . Lol
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That is b/c I looked at the babes in bikini thread 85 times in 7 hours.

:rotf2:

How about querying "salt water knockers"?

That explains why GDL's breasts thread was a big hit.

Have you seen the hits to the "bird watching" thread?:) There is one, over 11,200 hits!

Titles are everything, not just on SB: "British woman gripes about being too gorgeous, breaks Internet (almost)".

Samantha Brick, 41, a British freelance journalist who lives in France, is gaining notoriety for an essay she wrote for the Daily Mail. The headline? ‘There are downsides to looking this pretty’: Why women hate me for being beautiful.
It goes without saying that the essay’s premise — author faces hardships and unfair treatment from other women because she’s stunningly gorgeous — is asking for trouble. But ... WOW. Samantha Brick created so much buzz that she practically broke the Internet. She became a trending topic on Twitter and generated thousands of comments from readers over what BuzzFeed described as “quite possibly the least relatable essay ever written.”

Don't bother finding her picture, she's just and average blonde and wouldn't even rate a posting here on SB.:)