Granny
 

Elizabeth Warren Ancestry - Warren Ad - YouTube


So why did she deny being part Indian in the past when the topic 1st came up ?



What a lying sack of #^&#^&#^&#^& !

When did she do this?

It's quite possible that she has Native American ancestry, hell, I'm a member of the Cherokee tribe with full voting rights.

I guess the difference is I have the papers to prove it :devil2: :hihi:

-spence

The only person I know with "papers" on their ancestry is my bird dog.

did U have the papers verified through the pros at pawnstars....could be worth millions.....:)

So that video proves she is a big fat liar. She also is hiding her personnel records from Harvard and Penn. Warren was listed as a minority law professor in the desk book of association of American law schools from 1986 to 1995. She is a liar and she took a job from someone based on this status.

Truth be told she could not be given citizenship into the Cherokee nation based on the level of her heritage why would she be allowed to use the status for career advancement.

Seems like an individual of questionable character to me
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Even Obama doesn't have papers according to some....


ooops that's a different thread!:rotf2:

:biglaugh: :rotf2: :biglaugh: :rotf2: :biglaugh:

That's weird that you call your dog a person. I would just call it a dog.

The woman had a solid resume and has been recognized for her significant research. By any measure she was a very qualified candidate for the positions she's being accused of using status to gain.

The Cherokee Nation has no minimum "level of heritage" for tribal membership. The key factor is to have documentation proving lineage back to an ancestor on the Dawes Roll.

If Warren has *ANY* Cherokee blood she could apply for citizenship assuming she has evidence.

That being said. she probably wouldn't qualify for Native American status to gain preferential treatment for financial aid or special programs. Washington Post fact checked the Brown claims that she "checked the box" and couldn't find any evidence this actually occurred.

-spence

No, but the application process can be a pain. Ironically, like with President Obama they ask for the "long form" birth certificate which states don't usually release.

For my son's citizenship applications I had to have the state add my "race" to the regular birth certificate which is required by Cherokee records. At least because of my status I don't have to show full lineage, just prove they are my kids.

-spence

Better call the washington post spence! You can have a late breaking, err, I mean old news, scoop for them!

After weeks of controversy, Massachusetts Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren said on Wednesday night that she did indeed tell the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University that she was Native American.But she stipulated that the notification occurred only after she was hired by the two schools. The statement marks the first time Warren has explicitly stated that she self-identified as Native American to the law schools where she has been employed.

This doesn't contradict the statement I made above.

-spence

Agreed but she has not allowed the personnel files from Harvard and Penn to be released. So how could they gain evidentiary support of this. The fact of the matter is she was listed with minority status in the AALS.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it absolutley does, she admitted to "checking the box"

After weeks of controversy, Massachusetts Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren said on Wednesday night that she did indeed tell the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University that she was Native American.But she stipulated that the notification occurred only after she was hired by the two schools. The statement marks the first time Warren has explicitly stated that she self-identified as Native American to the law schools where she has been employed.

the fact of the matter is she told the schools she was, she admitted she did this.

The video at the top of this thread has her clearly stating that the people who hired her had no idea of her status.

Yes, AFTER she was hired.

I know the concept of time is a bit burdensome what with the two or three other facts to deal with.

-spence

irrelevant, you said there was no evidence she checked the box. What box are we talking about? She admitted she told them. I never said a word that she said she told them before she was hired? Neither did Brown.

Yes, there's apparently no evidence she did checked the box to apply for a position. That doesn't mean she didn't tell them afterword.

As for your "Neither did Brown" remark...look to the debate:

-spence

I want to hear more about her "significant research". I did some "significant research" of my own and I'm not impressed. Empty suit comes to mind.

She has stated that she has never practiced law in Ma too after being cornered into saying she has not passed the Ma. bar. Wait for it....

According to the Washington Post:

-spence

I was wrong.....amazing and clearly qualified... Yawn.....

warren took away from a prilverage american indian the one spot that was opened for a native american...also she is a product of jane lubchenco of Noaa.. she is aganist fishing

So she was recruited by Harvard who was being protested for their minority hiring practices and she was listed as a minority lawyer in the register.... but they hired her and then she told them by the way ....I'm a minority.
Maybe it's me....but it sure sounds like BS to me
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

why is this not surprising?...she's always been a complete fraud and if she were at all honest, she (and others) wouldn't have so much difficulty defending herself:uhuh:


"it reminds us of a substantive policy issue where Warren also failed to back up her claims with sufficient proof."

Elizabeth Warren Has Used Shoddy Evidence Before - By Alex Brill & Aparna Mathur - The Corner - National Review Online

Professor Shuchman concluded his book review with this powerful allegation:

This book (by Elizabeth Warren and her co-authors) contains so much exaggeration, so many questionable ploys, and so many incorrect statements that it would be well to check the accuracy of their raw data, as old as it is. But the authors arranged matters so that they could not provide access to the computer printouts by case, with the corresponding bankruptcy court file numbers, this preventing any independent check of the raw data in the files from which they took their information.


The Academic Scandal Elizabeth Warren and Harvard Don't Want You to Know About

Obviously not a bird hunter.:smash:

The US Government does(tax purposes).How ironic.