![]() |
The cost to have a Stable Genius
BREAKING: The US deficit hit $984 billion in FY2019, Treasury says, marking a nearly 50% increase under Trump.
Trump promised to eliminate federal debt in 8 years. Instead, it has been growing in his reign. 2019: $984bn 2018: $779 bn 2017: $665 bn 2016: $584 bn 2015: $442 bn The long con is pretty impressive, don’t worry Mexico or China will pay for it thru tariffs |
Quote:
|
Quote:
deficits,?so why do you exclude the first 6 years of obamas deficits? we all know the answer... you do have a point, trumps deficits are a serious problem, and he should be held to task. but obama racked up more debt than any president in history before him, let’s not make him out to be frugal. that was some serious cherry picking. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Or are you just being hypocritical? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Can you answer my question? Why were you so selective about which of Obama's annual deficits you compared to Trumps? |
Quote:
https://www.mercatus.org/publication...what’s-process |
Quote:
The only selection I made is that Obama is Trumps starting point. Nothing more than that. He inherited a growing GDP, a dropping unemployment rate, a rising Market and a dropping trade deficit and claims credit for all. Look at the Stable Genius’s tweets whining about Obama actions that he has himself far exceeded. Look behind the curtain as he said the other day, he has no team, he is the team. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Otherwise, what did he mean by referring to the importance of teamwork and his various teams in the past, such as Gowdy "will be a great asset as a member of our team." Which unfortunately didn't happen. |
Quote:
You're the one here, who posted historical deficits for Obama. I merely asked why you didn't go all the way back to 2009 0r 2010. The answer, is that in those years, Obama had the highest deficits ever recorded, and those facts didn't support the point you were trying to make. SO rather than draw a conclusion which fits the facts, you start with your conclusion, and cherry pick facts which support it, and ignore facts which don't. I find that amusing, because you're smart enough to know what you're doing. |
Quote:
Trump took that, made some big changes (tax cuts and eliminating regulations) and poured rocket fuel on the fire Obama started. I can happily admit they both implemented things which (1) are consistent with their ideology, and (2) which helped the economy. You make it sound like all Trump did, was let Obama's momentum continue. You're lying. |
Quote:
You are lying to yourself Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
rising Democrat star Rep. Katie Hill is a wild one huh? :hee:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Obamacare didn't add to the deficit? Since you brought this up but are still denying mathematical facts, here all the annual deficits for the last few years, without any cherry picking, because I'm not trying to prove a partisan point... 2019 - $960 billion budget deficit (projected) 2018 - $779 billion budget deficit 2017 - $665 billion budget deficit 2016 - $585 billion budget deficit 2015 - $439 billion budget deficit 2014 - $514 billion budget deficit 2013 - $719 billion budget deficit 2012 - $1.1 trillion budget deficit 2011 - $1.3 trillion budget deficit 2010 - $1.3 trillion budget deficit 2009 - $1.4 trillion budget deficit 2008 - $455 billion budget deficit SO you tell me Pete, who is responsible for the largest deficits? What do the facts tell you? If I posted unemployment by year, that would also send you running to hide under your bed. Who is lying? Gimme a break... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
I’ve got that right? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Trump inherited good momentum, he did things differently, and has brought deficits way back up. I never denied that. But I also know a ton of people who have personally benefitted from Trumps spending, at least. I'm not denying, conflating, or cherry picking. I don't have to, because unlike you, I can happily admit the good things the other side does and the stupid things my side does. You of all people aren't capable of that, not even close. |
Quote:
So what’s left when the inevitable downturn occurs? And you said some people did something. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
The second term will be the feather.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
I'm confident they'll be renewed, but having them for a while is a lot better than never having them. "the deficit is increasing in an economic expansion" That's bad, as I've said. "fewer people have health insurance which will shift costs onto those who do, further raising rates in a upward spiral and making it less affordable" I wasn't aware that when Obamacare added more people to insurance rolls, that lowered the cost for those who already had private insurance. In fact, I know for a fact that's not what happened. Quite the opposite in fact, because people on the exchanges had low reimbursement rates to health care providers, meaning they had to charge higher rates to those in the private sector. Spiraling medical costs are not caused by one party or the other. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com