IG probe
 

It’s reported that the IG report claims that an FBI lawyer who worked for Strzok, altered legal documents used to apply for FISA warrants against Carter Page.

I don’t have any clue if it’s true, and if it is, i have no clue of the severity of the alteration.

but the libs here already know there’s nothing to it. There can’t be. Because it doesn’t fit The Narrative.

Every single IG report ever done has found errors and/or discrepancies in the process. Just fill out some federal paperwork and you'll see why. I'll wait to see what was done.
I'm not surprised to see the initial claims and confident that it will become part of the Trumplican narrative, no matter what it turns out to be. It already has, just look at Faux.

Meanwhile look at the difference between the Floridaman administration as demonstrated by Sondland compared to the other fact witnesses who are career government employees.

Sondland is the guy Floridaman picked for one of the more important ambassadorial positions. Is he the exception or the rule?

you could not have done
more to prove my point. Somehow, you already know that it wasn’t a severe, meaningful alteration of
the document.

How do you know that already?

It may turn out that you are correct, in fact i hope you’re correct, i hope
an FBI lawyer didn’t cook the books
to get the warrant he wanted.

the point is, no details are out yet, but you’ve already made
up your mind. You’re
not interested in the truth. You’re interested in pushing what fits, denying what doesn’t fit. My god, you posted a dishonest Ken Starr
quote, and when i called
you out on it, you blamed Fox news! It wasn’t an honest mistake on your part, it was Foxnews’ fault.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Apparently you did not read my post.

"I'll wait to see what was done."

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit

you also said the whole investigation was "deligitimate". That's not exactly indicative of someone with an open mind.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

pete's a little cranky

Lot of that going around since November 2016.

In all seriousness, IF Trump gets re elected, are we going to have 4 more years of this?

where?

So you’d rather have Trump’s brazen abuses of power go unchecked?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

who said unchecked? ever heard of checks and balances, separation of powers? those are all still in tact, the supreme court has ruled against his policies a few times. god knows congress has investigated him.

why would you say unchecked?

spence, in our system of government, sometimes your guy wins, sometimes the other side wins. best if you can deal with that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

is the media abusing their power? What would that Sandman kid from Covington Catholic say on that subject, do you suppose?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It's all part of a plot against something, Jim

Remember "elections have consequences", that counts for the House also.

As one man said, those who tell the stories rule society and we have seen Nunes, Jordan and Ratcliffe trying desperately the past few days.

And here is what one odd fellow says:

"The Sandman is a mythical character in Western and Northern European folklore who puts people to sleep" He was chosen for this psyop because of his last name and his schools name which is coded 33 as CC Covington Catholic which represents the fallen angels.

I didn't follow much of that. I'm talking about a 16 year old kid who did absolutely nothing wrong, who was made out to be Hitler by the entire media, because it fir The Narrative.