![]() |
Minneapolis teachers contract says white teachers get fired first
This is explicitly in the contract. Let’s not fire the lousy teachers, let’s fire the honkeys.
Constitution, shmonstitution. We are becoming too stupid to live. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...seniority.html |
Poor victim :want:
Tucker said you're going to be replaced, didn't he? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOz1Bdq1t2M |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
the victims are the kids, who get stuck with teachers whose qualification is skin color. have you ever gotten one right? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Jim doesn’t understand the Teachers voted for the contract.. so there’s no discrimination it’s a condition of employment….
And of course Jim lies talking about people getting fired White teachers would be laid off first That’s not fired And when’s the last time you heard of teachers getting laid off Another spoon feed outrage from the far right echo chamber Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
You assume black teachers have no seniority and black teachers they will somehow take over theses schools section states that if a nonwhite teacher is subject to excess, the district must instead excess a white teacher with the “next least” seniority So basically if there are 150 white teachers And 4 black teachers and the need to lay 4 people off and 3 blacks have more seniority then the bottom 3 white and 1 black the black women keeps her job Doesn’t sound that earth shattering And please don’t make it sound as if you care about fairness all of a sudden Ps search this story all the hits are right wing sites imagine that Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
the leftists are really in their glory when they can get on a good "you must be a racist" rant.....:cheers:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The contract specifies that you group teachers by seniority, and fire the white ones first. What if a white teacher happens to be the best teacher? Is that not possible? anyway, you did what all of you do, you ignored what i said, and responded ( stupidly) to something i never came close to saying. here’s a crazy idea…let’s judge people by what they do ( which we can all control) and leave color ( which we have no control over and therefore says absolutely nothing about us) out of it. why not fire the tall teachers? or the blonde teachers? do you ot see how stupid this is? just because it came from the left, you can’t criticize it. never. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
it’s not racist to say that skin color is literally the only thing that matters. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Soon, you’ll be replaced
They’re coming for your boat too….. It’s white, isn’t it? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
This is explicitly in the contract. Let’s not fire the lousy teachers, let’s fire the honkeys. Hence you have an integrity problem 2nd the contract was passed by the teachers themselves and The policy doesn’t mention race, which better positions the district and union, experts say. 3rd it’s called a condition of employment In my union we approved a contract that if you were seen smoking or using tobacco products you could be terminated Of course those who got fired tried to say if violated their Rights. The Courts said you willing negotiated that Right away for a raise Same thing happened with detailed doctors notes people cried hippa Courts sorry you negotiated that privacy away This is no different just faux white outraged . Trying to claim it’s going to throw white better teachers out the door over black teachers who can’t possibly possess the same skills .. tell me I am wrong Jim even under the old rules seniority would supersede the best teacher if they had no seniority Didn’t see the Right complaining about that Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
you have kids in a school. the school has to lay off a teacher. Would you rather (a) they fire the worst, laziest, least-skilled teacher, or (b) automatically fire the least senior white teacher, even if thatbhaooems to be a terrific teacher? Have fun answering that. everybody knows who the worst teachers are. How is it not best for the kids, to get rid of them first? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
I just got an expensive looking flyer from the NEARI telling it's members which democrats to vote for in upcoming elections
|
Quote:
here i’m CT, for ten years, the speaker of the state house of representatives was a liberal democrat. Legislature is a part time job in CT, they all have full time jobs. His full time job? He was a rep for the largest state employee union! He worked for the state employee union. So as a state rep, it was his job to vote on the size of his paycheck at his full time job. No conflict of interest there! Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
to funny your article has nothing to do with (a) they fire the worst, laziest, or keeping least-skilled teacher it's still all about seniority until it gets to the bottom of the list but keep injecting something that doesn't apply the way its written A white teacher would have the same protections if the majority of teachers we Black .. but again if the contract stated Race which it does :btu:not |
Quote:
In the United States, a political action committee (PAC) is a 527 organization, that pools campaign contributions from members and donates those funds to campaigns for or against candidates, ballot initiatives, or legislation. they cant and dont use union funds to promote campaigns for or against candidates, ballot initiatives, or legislation. But again Scott don't let the facts get in your way :btu: |
Quote:
doesn’t mention firing the worst teacher, because per the contract, they must fore the white teacher. I don’t think you understand what’s happening. i’ll see if i can put it into a pop-up book for you. it’s not all about seniority. it’s about seniority and race Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote: Originally Posted by scottw View Post I just got an expensive looking flyer from the NEARI telling it's members which democrats to vote for in upcoming elections |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yet In You mind their telling their members who to vote for … More fantasy’s Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
And if you wanted you donated to your unions PAC or not it’s was never required was it. But it’s funny conservatives like yourself have no issues with dark money and corporate lobbyists But a teacher union you see as a threat and their political sway is somehow unfair LOL Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
answer? teachers unions hurt kids and communities. they enrich teachers and democrats. when i taught, i offered to be the teacher moderator for the ping ping club. there was no money in it, the school was broke. i was happy to do it for free. I get a letter from the union ordering me not to do it unless they paid me. All for the kids. They ( the union) are the most soulless whores you could ever meet. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Do you ever get tired of pounding a square pegs into a round holes teachers unions hurt kids and communities. they enrich teachers and democrats. Yep teachers are so rich and they enrich Democratic’s They ( the union) are the most soulless whores you could ever meet. please spare me your conspiracy’s your just another victim blaming others because you don’t have their pay or their benefits or the guts to do the job … you re pettiness is pathetic for a grown man Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com