View Single Post
Old 05-30-2013, 08:49 AM   #14
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyD View Post
The problem is that counting fish is a very inaccurate science. As such, they need to take their already terrible data and include a buffer. Making decisions based on poor data is no better than just guessing.
Counting fish is extremely difficult. Lots of moving pieces, and many moving pieces that we can't even know about...

But does anyone doubt that the stocks are in terrible shape? Let me re-phrase...does anyone who is not economically impacted by this, doubt that stocks are in terrible shape?

I feel for the folks who will be unable to make a living, and I hope that some of my tax dollars are used to help them as best we can. But if the stocks are headed to near-extinction, what's the alternative? If stocks are declining, then the longer we wait, the harsher the inevitable fix will be...
Jim in CT is offline   Reply With Quote