View Single Post
Old 11-06-2013, 07:40 PM   #5
numbskull
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
iTrader: (0)
 
numbskull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5/0 View Post
Don't hold back.
Not to hijack the thread but would like to know more.

5/0
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Alright. This gets complicated and expensive, however.

The issue is one of ring size and guide height weight. With braid you can cast well through a 16 or 20 mm collector guide PROVIDED IT IS HIGH ENOUGH OFF THE BLANK AND FAR ENOUGH OUT. The 30 and 40mm rings (never mind a 50mm ring!) we are used to serve no purpose to control the braid but are all we have in standard guides to provide the necessary height to limit line slap. This creates a problem since if you start with a 40mm KW guide you need a bunch more big ringed guides to get down to the blank and that means your choke point (the spot where you can switch to small running guides to keep weight down is way out near the tip....really just a foot or two from where you'd be if you used the old cone of flight system. There is a better way to do it using LC guides that have small rings and lots of height.

Right now, I think the best way to build an 11ft surf rod uses titanium low rider guides (T-LC) for the first three guides and then Titanium KW or KT (T-KW or T-KT, which are single foot) as small runners. I can vouch from test casting and fishing that this system works well a medium sized spool, such as a ZB25 (or VS200 or Stella 8000 I suppose although I do not own either of the latter reels)......and those reels are plenty powerful enough for striped bass. For bigger spools like a 706, VS 300 I have too little experience to make any claims. For 10 foot rods and full sized reels like the above you can make it work but I think casting distance starts to suffer. With smaller reels like a 5000 or 6000 then most definitely it is worth trying the LC collector on 10 or even 9 ft rods.

Setting a rod up like this, particularly a slow action rod like a GSB, will let it cast as well as any other layout, but be much more tip lighter and responsive than any other guide system (it gets cost prohibitive, however, unless you are building for yourself since the guides end up costing about $180). Be clear, however, that LC guides ARE NOT GOING TO INCREASE YOUR CASTING DISTANCE ON AN 11FT ROD. The reason to use them is to get a lighter, quicker rod.

The way I do it is to use a T-LC 20mm collector just far enough out to prevent line slap (it does not have to be the 47" that gets thrown around in most low rider discussions) then transition the line down into the blank through a T-LC 12m and T-LC 8-10 guide, then switch to small (usually T-KW 8's ) runners out to the tip (usually 5-6 of them). This keeps guide size (and thereby weight) to a minimum and much below what is obtained using the old NGC formula's that people still use as "state of the art" but are actually compromise setups designed to work with mono which is not something I care about or need.

The system I am using turns out to antedate but strongly resemble a new guide system that is being advanced by Fuji called the "K-concept".......but one that so far can only effectively be done using their new high version small ring K-LH single foot guides, which look too fragile for most surf use.

Hopefully soon, maybe even this winter, Fuji will put out double footed tall small ringed guides (i.e, KW-H) which I think will then become the "best" way to build a surf rod......best meaning light, responsive, and tough.........not prioritizing weed or knot clearance or line/spool size compromises. These will be much cheaper than titanium low riders and probably not much heavier. Until then, however, using KW guides on your rod as a collector and transition guides requires big rings and large guides to get the height you need.....and that comes at the expense of weight, particularly in the mid section of the rod.

Again, I am not recommending everyone else go out and spend a fortune to build a rod with titanium low rider guides. I think Fuji will release higher KW guides soon and they will produce rods as good or better than what you can do with low riders currently. Also, the present KW guides and layouts still produce perfectly good rods that most people are happy with and shelling out $180 to get titanium low riders and runners/tip may build you a nicer rod, but one that you will never recoup the expense if Fuji does produce cheaper equally effective KW-H guides. Finally, the larger the spool the less effective the LC guides become on rods 11 feet and under (on longer rods where you can put the first guide way out there it is a different story and LC guides are the standard).

In the case of the OP, he makes it clear he is not looking for alternatives, but what he is proposing (a 50mm T-KW) is extraordinarily expensive (the big T-KW guides run near $100 each) and completely unnecessary for braid (the huge KW guides are meant for tuna spinners where the first guide has to be 18" from a BIG spool). I think he'd do best to save his VS 300 for tuna, get a ZB25, and meet me at the canal to see what a well laid out GSB1321M can do. Either that or wait a year and see what Fuji comes out with.

I will say that his choice of rod blank is right on. A lightly built GSB1321M is one helluva impressive tool for striped bass fishing in the rocks.
numbskull is offline   Reply With Quote