11-10-2013, 02:49 PM
|
#24
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I never denied it, the other context simply outweighed it. wow, another cheap shot...you people are really bad
You accuse Time of taking the low road which they clearly did rather than discuss issues but that appears to be exactly what the article is about.at least a one sided 'discussion' of the issues
It's funny this disdain with Time like it's a pillar of liberal thinking. traditionally...have you seen their covers?
I can't think of a single time in my life a liberal actually mentioned something in Time magazine.that's because liberals don't actually read TIME, they just subscribe to it and leave it laying around the house hoping that the mailman and visitors notice it and think they are well informed, I know many liberals who do this
I doubt most modern progressives even acknowledge it exists...they don't acknowledge a lot of what exists
-spence
|
that was fun
Last edited by scottw; 11-10-2013 at 03:27 PM..
|
|
|
|