View Single Post
Old 01-03-2014, 12:18 PM   #50
Gloucester2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 833
Blog Entries: 1
Not sure it is any of the articles posted here but I read someone from CRMC defending the work - specifically the movement of rocks that were in the water back onto the seawall - which was not contemplated in the original plans - they did that at the request of CMRC - I agree with JohnR seems legit . . . access issues aside.
Gloucester2 is offline   Reply With Quote