View Single Post
Old 12-16-2014, 06:36 PM   #11
ivanputski
Pete K.
iTrader: (0)
 
ivanputski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman View Post
FYI We are all on the same team.
Everybody's trying to reach the 25% reduction . I think that's a good thing
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Why do i get the feeling that you think the reduction is a good thing strictly contingent upon being allowed 2 fish per day?
Your continued opposition to 1 fish, and strong support of being allowed to continue killing 2 per day does not put you and me on the same side...
I'm on the side of killing less so there are more fish alive in the ocean... You seem to be on the side of killing more so there's no interruption of money in your pocket. You just cant have it both ways.
The asmfc made that clever little conservational equivalency "menu" yet they forgot the fine print that says " selecting certain options leads to less fish in the ocean"
All those options were created so the asmfc can pass the final decision off to the states in a crappy attempt to make everyone happy without looking like the bad guy... All while sitting pretty under their window-dressing vote of " look! We passed 1@28" and we did our job".
Buuuuulllll shhhhhhhhh you did!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Last edited by ivanputski; 12-16-2014 at 06:45 PM..
ivanputski is offline   Reply With Quote