Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The problem is exactly this. Taking a very narrow scenario and then scaling it...
Scaled very well.
I think some thought there may be follow on attacks and we thought we had some people who may know something. In that scenario I could see someone who believed torture worked may authorize in defiance of the law.
I think what you thought some thought is scaled a bit low, but, I think, maybe, its possibly somewhat OK.
But that's not where things stopped.
|
Yes, it stopped, scale and all. Old news. Oh, wait. It stopped after the original scenario was scaled. But the Dem Senate decided to scale it some more. Starting with a narrow scenario which did not include views of the original scalers. And self-righteously stopped with the self-proud massive scale that the initial scale would never be scaled again because of their one-sided ultimately scaled investigation. With the self-congratulatory admission that their ultimate scaling might actually result in the escalated scaling of radical Islamists in response.
Good stuff, Spence. Very brief and readable.