Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Ok, I'll answer and I'm hoping you'll address the items I pointed out in my 1st post.
They used the term luxury bc most American's don't spend $80,000 on a recreational boat (just bc it is a center counsel we don't know what he is doing with it).
Now pls. show me where/how they painted him as a "rich pluticrat" as the use of the word "luxury" alone certainly doesn't imply when taken into context when you read the whole article. Also, show us where the NYT's shows "him as out of touch"? Finally, where did the article state he was a fisherman?
Did you do a search on what the NYT's said about the Kerry's boat?
Your posts are just full of anger and hate. Who calls a woman vile and repugnant?
Thanks
|
I tried to answer your questions. The article didn't say he was an out-of-touch plutocrat, but only a liberal apologist would deny that was the intent, especially when it was published th eday after part 1 of the hit piece, where we learned the shocking news that Rubio gets a ticket every 5 years or so.
If you deny that the NYT is a liberal publication, you're incorrect. Not many people woud deny the blatant left-leaning bias there.
"where did the article state he was a fisherman?"
It didnb't, I made that comment. He said on TV that he uses th eboat to fish with his family. Maybe he's lying and he's really a drug-runner.
"Who calls a woman vile and repugnant?"
Huh? A female cannot be described as vile or repugnant? Says who? Females don't do vile and repugnant things? Here on Earth, women are just as likely to be vile and repugnant as men. Hilary has no scruples whatsoever. I'm not angry, just stating facts. You don't happen to like thos efacts, and you cannot refute them, so in classic liberal fashion, you label me as the angry white male. Because to liberals, it is acceptable, even virtuous, to be humiliated by someone suffering a psychotic episode.
I do hate Hilary, guilty as charged.