Thread: obamaland
View Single Post
Old 09-05-2015, 11:25 AM   #8
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
If you'd taken my advice and "read more" on the subject you'd realize that the people were in fact were authorized to work in the USA.
and if you'd read what the doj said...you's see that the company was fined for asking non-citizens to confirm their immigration status as a condition of employment while not asking U S Citizens to confirm their immigration status, immigration status/guest worker status, which you may or not know, can change with time....it's not a permanent situation or arrangement....well....maybe,,,depends on whether someone chooses to obey or enforce federal law

“The department’s investigation found that the company required non-U.S. citizens, but not similarly-situated U.S. citizens, to present specific documentary proof of their immigration status to verify their employment eligibility,” the DOJ claims

again...

non- citizens SHOULD be required "to present specific documentary proof of their immigration status to verify their employment eligibility"


I can't think of a single reason why a.... U S citizen should be required to present specific documentary proof of their immigration status to verify their employment eligibility


but we are living in strange times

Last edited by scottw; 09-05-2015 at 11:30 AM..
scottw is offline