Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating - View Single Post

PaulS · 09-23-2015, 02:03 PM

prob. no undue hardship but in Co. there was an antidiscrimination act. preventing people from discriminating against gays and that that the court said it didn't have anything to do w/religion. Providing goods/services was included in the law. The court said that the U.S.S.C.'s ruling in the gay marriage case meant that if you don't recognize gay marriage, you are discriminating against gays. They said that if he made the cake it does not mean that he supports gay marriage and doesn't violate his 1st amend. rights. I think they even said he can post a note saying he doesn't support gay marriage. The Co. court also said that bc of the antidiscrimination act (or the way it was written) freedom of religion had nothing to do with the case.

09-23-2015, 02:03 PM	#30
PaulS Registered User iTrader: (0) Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 10,300	prob. no undue hardship but in Co. there was an antidiscrimination act. preventing people from discriminating against gays and that that the court said it didn't have anything to do w/religion. Providing goods/services was included in the law. The court said that the U.S.S.C.'s ruling in the gay marriage case meant that if you don't recognize gay marriage, you are discriminating against gays. They said that if he made the cake it does not mean that he supports gay marriage and doesn't violate his 1st amend. rights. I think they even said he can post a note saying he doesn't support gay marriage. The Co. court also said that bc of the antidiscrimination act (or the way it was written) freedom of religion had nothing to do with the case.