Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
That's what the investigators are saying. There's a line of thinking that they may not have intended to attack the party but some disagreement changed their actions. Don't know right now.
You know the Fort Hood shooting was never declared terrorism either as it didn't meet the legal standard?
|
"That's what the investigators are saying"
Who, exactly? Please tell me who said that there are legal ramifications for the President throwing that word around.
Spence, we can debate about when it's appropriate to concluder that it was terrorism., But I don't believe for a second, that there are laws that would prevent him from saying "this looks lik eIslamic terrorism". But, you have prroven me wrong a few times, mybe this is another example.
"You know the Fort Hood shooting was never declared terrorism either as it didn't meet the legal standard"
What 'legal standard'?
I notice that your hero Obama doesn't mind spouting off half-assed, when he says that the Cambridge acted stupidly, or that if he had a son, he'd look like whoever it was. Obama's caution about not putting his goot in his mouth, seems quite selective, does it not?
The Fort Hood shooter had a card in his wallet that identified him as a "Soldier Of Allah". He was screaming "Allahu Akhbar" as he killed Americans. He was a terrorist. Only someone with a real political axe to grind, would debate that.