Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
The swede is not wrong on paper, but is fundamentally morally wrong.
How do atheists arrive at some "morality?" Are all atheists supposed to think alike. Is one atheist's "morality" superior to another's? What if one atheistic morality, say a communist, understands and "believes" it is proper and necessary to subjugate atheists of another morality (free market atheists for instance), and to impose its own morality on them? Who is to say either morality is the "good" one? Would it be the ultimate atheistic morality to say that the strong one should prevail? What other "metric" should be applied to decide? Should one morality simply give itself up to the other so as to avoid the immorality of opposing another morality? You say you have stronger Christian beliefs than most Christians. Would you go the limit and turn your other cheek when those of a different persuasion than you wish to subjugate you to their morality?
I bet he is also a white supremacist and jerks off to midget porn while wearing women's underwear.  |
I bet it felt good to say that. Perhaps makes you morally to superior to most Christians.