Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Besides, the system isn't immoral, it's actually an improvement. If the GOP followed the same they'd have a mechanism to obstruct a radical candidate who's hijacked the party.
|
"Besides, the system isn't immoral, it's actually an improvement...obstruct a radical candidate who's hijacked the party"
DING DING DING!! Because to liberal elitists (like you), the people you claim to care about, cannot be trusted to decide who to nominate.
So tell us Spence, who exactly are the registered Democrats whose primary vote doesn't matter to you, unless you happen to approve? Blacks? Mexicans? Stay-at-home moms? The poor? Everyone who didn't go to college?
Boy did you tee THAT ONE up for anyone who understands what "democracy" means.
This from Spence, a person who I'm sure claims to care about Democracy, who said that if teh majority votes in a way he doesn't likje, then "it's an improvement" if instead, we make deals behind the scenes, to get the outcome that serves the power brokers rather than the outcome that reflects the will of the people you claim to care about.
Holy, holy, sh*t. How can you possibly not see the fascism in that?
If Trump gets 50.0001% of the delegates, he's the nominee, that's the way it works on my side, whether I happen to like it or not. That's called democracy. Yeesh...