Quote:
Originally Posted by Fly Rod
It's amaszing that the people do not include the clintons in the 1%...then again if it were not for the rich(1%) we would not B working....take Mark zuckerberg, he is in the 1% employs over12,600 people....I'm sure some have bought new cars, a house...it's not all bad being in the 1%, take spence for instance, he would not B able to buy them armanian suits if not for the 1%......lol.....  |
if it were not for the rich(1%) we would not B working.
you really dont get it do you....
look what a worker got paid and what a company made .. in the 50 60s early 70s it started to shift in the 80s it was symbiotic relationship between the 2
not now that model has left the building.. the ratio to wages and profit are out of balance... you cant see that is the real issue today for todays workers