Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
I am glad you did some research unlike others and I was happy to inform you it wasn't him but one of his followers ( as i said who carry his water) the moment you asked your question ... I also posted a link to the news story and the photo.. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-from-twitter/ no attempt to mislead .. it was taken for the story I should have provided the link in the 1st post
the photo was also framed in a question .. do all who support this Milo support this style of speech ( personal attack) hiding behind we need less political correctness .. |
The problem is when people post stuff like this, many won't research it (I research a lot of topics) and people believe too much of what they read without verifying.
But this is a deeper problem, too much superficial discourse and not enough substantial discourse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
So you tried to post the photo as if Milo posted it, got corrected by john and then switched to
sorry you are not correct I posted a Photo from a news story.. and then I asked if you support that type of Free speech ... and no answer was given
John asked a question and was answered see how that works
|
I support just about any free speech. I might not support the message but I support the ability to have that message. (You backed it up with your service
)
I don't support the KKK (I loathe them) but I support their right to free speech - and quick go to jail when they screw up. I don't support BLM but I support their right to protest (until they go illegal).
When free speech is curtailed (common from the left BTW - seen a college campus lately?) we all pay for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
I'm going to stick to your text. In the first instance, you asked if I"enjoy calling their insults.. Free speech . . ." In this instance, you say you asked if I support "that type of Free speech. . ." So, unless I'm missing something, or misinterpreting you again, it seems that you have evolved from recognizing their insults merely as free speech, to recognizing it as a "type" of free speech. In the first instance, it was not clear whether you even considered their insults as free speech or merely if I enjoyed calling it free speech.
My answer is that I support free speech. That is supposed to include insults. It's irrelevant if I enjoy it or not. That's the way I see how it works.
|