Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
I guess this is where we differ I support free speech until that freedom is used with the intent to stoke hatred promote violence by one group against another or attacks a person or group on the basis of attributes such as gender, ethnic origin, religion, race, disability, or sexual orientation and thats where I separate my support for free speech when that speech's only function is ATTACK ...
Milos post on twitter wasn't to promote an idea .. there was no bigger message from Milos or his followers it was all attack , humiliate and insult a singular person .. and thats just wrong no matter who its done to
|
We do differ then - I think all speech should be allowed. Why allow someone to think they are a fool when you can remove all doubt.
The next issue is when people can wrangle themselves into a position where they can define what speech is free and what speech is not, there is no more Free Speech.
I don't always agree with Milo but I love how he gets all these institutions of higher learning into a two minutes of hate frenzy. Then emperor has no clothes.