Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Jim if the media is ignoring then how do all know its happening again there has been no smoking gun in theses email and the one trump used was found out to be a fake..
Her campaign's views on Catholics
you mean 2011 Mr. Podesta and Jennifer Palmieri, who is now a senior Clinton campaign official,(not then) received a note from their Center for American Progress colleague John Halpin the Had nothing to do with her campaigns position on Catholics.. again facts dont matter
“must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations.”
another attempt to attach something to Clinton that had nothing to do with Clinton
Get back to me when She runs on Hate ,, thats the issue Trump speaks His hate openly it and I am Glad for that ..
you do go thru Great lengths to defend Donald can you articulate why he should be POTUS his policys postions how they will be funded beside the usual Answer JUST Because
|
"attempt to attach something to Clinton that had nothing to do with Clinton "
By your own words, the communication was between people who are now her senior advisors. She has chosen to let in her inner circle, people who hate Catholics.
It's funny, not long ago, the entire media was fixated on whether or not Trump would publicly reject David Duke. What did that have to do with Trump? Zip. What does this have to do with Hilary? She selected these bigots to help lead her campaign.
"Get back to me when She runs on Hate "
Consider this me getting back to you. She thinks half of Trump's supporters, which represent tens of millions of Americans, are deplorable and racist and sexist and homophopic, and xenophobic and Islamophobic. That was in a prepared speech. That's not running on hate, my friend? Could you please, for once, give me a direct answer to a direct question?