Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
So if the argument is there're necessary to repel a tyrannical government who is armed to the teeth with combat issue rifles what was the point again?
Not to mention, how often are selective fire weapons used in full auto?
|
The general population, with existing sporting rifles, would be sufficient to hold any theoretical tyrannical takeover by government. Particularly a government that's military has taken an oath to Constitution, not some party.
As for selective fire, they are more used in 3 burst mode or full auto than any AR15 that cannot do anything beyond one pull pf trigger per round. But you already know that (I think).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
Yeah. There has certainly been chipping away at our personal freedoms and liberties. The government has more control over a woman’s ovaries than any AR-14 gun owner....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Unable to determine is the sarc close tag is intentionally missing, so I'll bite. Gee Eben, How so?