Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
He's technically right but that's just legal wonk. The DOJ could still bring additional indictments to Stone, or they might think the charges against Stone for conspiracy may not be strong enough for a grand jury but the obstruction and false statements are. Regardless it doesn't seem like he has a lot of lying to be accountable for.
You're comparing apples and tractor tires. Regardless the FISA warrant for Page was based on a lot of intel that had nothing to do with the Dossier. Even with that, there are no rules that state info like the Dossier can't be used for the warrant, it's up for the judge to decide, and 4 republican appointed federal judges agreed with the surveillance.
|
so what is in the stone indictments, which connects team
trump directly to wikileaks and the russians?
agreed on the steele dossier, no rules against it. but when it’s paid for by an opposition political campaign, and used to spy on a citizen ( didnhebget accused or indicted or
convicted of
anything, by the way?), smells like
the opposite of democracy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device