View Single Post
Old 02-27-2019, 09:35 AM   #6
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
You also have the current leader of the democrats, Cortez, suggesting (while sipping white wine and cooking dinner in one of her two homes), whether or not it's moral to have children. Yes, Cassandra, the world is so awful when your brain can barely generate enough power to move your legs, yet you are younger than 30 and have 2 homes and are already just about set for life. Boo hoo.

The ability of liberals to spit in the face of the most obvious, basic human impulses of decency and existence, constantly astonishes me.

Why is it surprising that the party which thinks the government should suggest that large numbers of young people not have children, should also decide it's OK to kill a living baby? Those two notions, while disgusting, are conceptually consistent.

And here in CT, these people cannot lose an election, no matter what they do. At the state high school girls indoor track championships, biological males who call themselves female dominated the competition, meaning fewer girls were allowed to move on to the New England championships. The 'party of science', can't admit out loud that men are physically different than women, and when Martyna Navritolova (who dedicated her life to gay rights) states the scientifically obvious, she is silenced. Yes, look at all the tolerance and science coming from that side.
Jim in CT is offline