Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
They clearly lay out that the material could be political in nature and intended to hurt Candidate #1's campaign. They're not going to name the Clinton campaign by name, it's not how the application process works.
This is after dozens of redacted pages that outline secret information to justify the warrant.
|
Candidate #1 is Trump.
I thought about just letting you go on and on and let you spin why Candidate 1 was the victim....would have been interesting to say the least
