Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
If the Pres. appoints someone then generally I think they should be held accountable for that appointment - in most circumstances. except when? If the person had been arrested for financial fraud who was the last appointee... that had previously been arrested? oh wait...Van Jones?and they later pad their expense acct. gave their friend insider info, etc., then the Pres. should be accountable. if they were previously arrested and don't do these things are they OK?If it is a political appointment and the person is not qualified and later does a lousy job, it is on the Pres. etc. and that should go for both parties. this happens ALL THE TIME
|
can you explain this? I read it three times and...it doesn't make much sense
