Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
you’ve called me angry god knows how many times. it’s what intellectual wimps do when (1) they can’t respond to the case you’ve made, and (2) can’t admit you might have a point. You want me to pull up a few of your vile posts - and many are not w/o anything close to that by who your insulting.
Paul, i also like jousting with you most of the time, but your differing rules depending on party are becoming much more glaring. Be a bit less like Pete and a bit more like ririckhound.
I dont believe i insult specific people here for no reason. i do it when i have a terrific reason.You constantly liberals are this and liberals are that. Yet for some reason don't think it is insulting.
You desperately try to make me out to be a blind conservative partisan. it’s not close to true. but you play that card anyway. there have been plenty of posts here where i’ve sided with liberals, i have been in the exact opposite side of issues with Scott and detbuch and SD. but i can disagree with them respectfully. you guys make it very tough.
when pete says it was ok for obama to our kids in cages but a crime against humanity when Trump does it ( based solely on the basis that trump does it more often), rational conversation isn’t possible. Trump had a blanket policy to do it to all children. Obama's policy was to do it where they weren't sure if the child was with their parent or other similar reason so it wasn't the same.
when you deny any rational inference that Hunters job could be related to who his dad was, rational conversation is difficult.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I never said Hunter didn't get the job bc of this dad. That is not a crime. Would it be proper for the DOJ to announce an investigation into Trump for pedo. bc Epstein was a pedo and Trump is on camara saying he hung out w/Epstein liked "young girls"?