Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Stripers
Bizarre legal strategy, we now admit he did the dirty dead
No, "we" are not saying that the deed was dirty. And"we" are not saying that an actual "deed" was done. The deed did not occur. It is alleged that he wanted to do the deed. But the deed was not done.
but he can do anything he likes in order to get elected if he thinks it’s in the public interest.
No. Dershowitz was speaking of foreign policy decisions. He is not able to commit treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. That also applies to his foreign policy actions. And even his foreign policy decisions can be contested or not funded if they require money and many other ways, including lack of support from his own party.
Can you imagine how bad that could get if expanded into other areas of what he perceives is not in the public interest.
See above.
He can seek help from a foreign power to influence our elections, illegally hold back military aid putting our national security at risk and when caught obstruct congress from doing its job, all because what is important is getting re-elected because he perceives it’s in the public interest.
Crazy wacky legal argument is what your left with when you really can’t defend the charges.
|
Your crazy wacky legal argument is merely a false conjecture, and a concocted speculative narrative about what supposedly happened.