Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
All Trump needed to do was wait till sentencing was over and Pardon his Pal He didn't .. He interfered ...
Barr had already made his decision before Trump twittered about it. There was no interference in making that decision.
But if the process that leads to conviction has been dishonest,
there are steps to address those possibilities... Just imagining that the process was dishonest with zero supporting evidence is called A conspiracy Theory... and the right lives in them daily AS does Trump
|
One of the steps is to dissent. Complain. Argue with logic and evidence. There have been many dissenting arguments with what was considered supporting evidence re the criminal pursuit of Stone. Even what he was convicted of was not a crime that existed before he was investigated, but were basically process crimes that occurred because of the investigation.
This sort of dissent happens a lot in investigations and trials and convictions or exonerations. It happes a lot on this forum by those on both "sides." It's not an interference, it is part of free speech, freedom of thought, freedom of dissent. It is a healthy sign that those freedoms still exist.
You complain about authoritarianism, yet you display an authoritarian attitude toward dissenters you don't agree with. You dismiss them as mindless conspiracy theorists, yet you mindlessly spout your own conspiracy theory that "the right lives in them daily".