Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
No jim he lied how they got him to lie is irrelevant
If I ask you a question I already know the answer . And ask you how am I the dirty party aka FBIdirectly you have 2 choices admit it or lie .. ,, the notes you keep bringing up have zero to do with him pleading guilty
|
"how they got him to lie is irrelevant "
Not to many people.
So at the start of the investigation, he hadn't committed a crime. And "if" the goal was to get him to commit a crime that he otherwise would not have committed, and "if" this was done for political reasons (still a pretty big "if" but becoming more and more plausible), most people would have a huge problem with that.
The Justice Department isn't supposed to be a weapon used to settle political vendettas.
Anyway, he's free.
We also have some documents released yesterday which show that the democrats found precisely zilch to support the Russian collusion fiasco.
And then, we have the findings of John Durham's inquiry, which became an criminal probe as we all know. You can bet those findings get released right before the election.
And finally, we have Tara Reade doing a piece with Ronan Farrow (hero of the metoo movement) for the New Yorker soon.
Combine all that, with Biden's ill-timed onset of senility.
"how am I the dirty party aka FBI"
If they just asked him straight up and he lied, that's on him, I agree. What you are denying (cuz it doesn't fit your political agenda, which trumps all else) is that if it was done in a way to entice or incentivize him to lie, that's entrapment, right? I wasn't there and you weren't there, so neither of us knows. What we do know, is that right at the start, there's obvious evidence that they were out to get him. We know that senior FBI officials made no secret that they hated Trump and "they'd stop him" from becoming President.
I wonder where it says in the FBI's charter, that one of their functions is to influence presidential elections.