Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Non of what you wrote happened his rights weren't Trampled that's just another made up conspiracy, notes are notes but the notes never said plant false evidence or pull out his nails or or water board him .. hey basically get this Russian loving former General ..who lie to us. PS Trump fired him not the FBI so there goes that argument.... and they did and caught him in 2 lies
But it's ok for Trump to pardon a war criminal?
|
"Non of what you wrote happened his rights weren't Trampled that's just another made up conspiracy, "
How do you know this? What about the things that the DOJ lawyers withheld from the defense and from the judge? id that happen, or am I making that up?
"PS Trump fired him not the FBI so there goes that argument.... "
The FBI note didn't say "let's fire him". It said "is the goal to get him fired." They got him fired. So it exactly supports the argument. Exactly.
How do you know they didn't violate his rights? The judge hasn't ruled yet, but somehow you know. Please explain how you know? Or cite a source? Or are you just jumping to the most anti-Trump conclusion possible, which is what you always do?
As I said, I have zero knowledge of what happened (other than the note, and the fact that they withheld documents that should have been shared). Of course it's entirely possible that you happen to know a lot more of what happened than I do. But ware we just supposed to assume you do? Can you support your conclusion that his right weren't trampled?