Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Understand what’s going on here. If Congress cannot agree then the President gets to do it anyway.
That is how the Constitution works. Next step is challenging it to the Supreme Court. Progressive Judges would let it pass if it is Progressive policy set by Progressive President and Congress. Textual originalist would not let it stand.
Tax policy, social safety net policy, dictating to states unemployment policy, social security... no need for Congress. President/King gets to decide.
Will Tweety’s sycophants in Senate stand for this usurping of their power under Constitution? Are they going to allow destruction of checks & balances in this great nation? Are they ready to accept this new executive power from future Presidents? Speak up. I cant hear you.
|
It is the Progressive dream to eliminate checks and balances. We have been trending Progressive in government for 100 years with intermittent bumps against it along the way. The Progressives have set the precedent for and progressively have made more possible this executive power (which is not new as you claim). After the Dems and the Progressive media, along with the Progressive Repubs, destroyed the Tea Party, they made more possible this nightmare that you seem to fear.
I have been speaking up, and you have not been listening, for quite a while. How about you speak up on how this destruction of the Constitution can be avoided?