Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
The main thing to understand is that prior to being investigated he did nothing for which there was a valid reason to investigate. That's why he was not charged with anything more than the coerced "lie." What he did before that "lie" was perfectly legal. There was no valid reason to investigate him in the first place. And when the FBI determined that and wanted to close the investigation, it was continued under no valid reason until Flynn could be coerced into "lying."
|
This is such utter horse hockey. Flynn was under an active investigation because of his contacts with Russians which the IG said was justified. The interview was predicated on his meddling in US policy and his cover up which could compromise him as the Russians could prove he was lying.
Funny, The Obama administration is shaking their heads at the lack of a Russian response to sanctions and dismissals, the reality is Flynn's intervening and this is no reason for the FBI to see what the hell is going on???
This would require the complete suspension of logic to believe, or just a corrupt attorney general.