Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian
Your point?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Sandbrook's sub-title of the article is " Is this proof we got it all terribly wrong?" Those who wanted to open up the economy were criticized as anti-science or protecting what was left of the "Trump economy." Those who insisted that we must follow the science were positive that the science demanded a lockdown, and still does to a great degree.
Sweden did not destroy its economy, life and living is fairly normal there, and the virus has basically been relegated to a sort of flu while the rest of the world that had draconian and extended lockdowns have shattered economies, and are looking for more lockdowns as the virus surges.
Did we get it wrong? And has our version of "the science" been flawed? And should we be opening up more and locking down, or threatening to, less?