Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Biden is a far more capable politician, that’s why RBG got 94 votes.
People forget that Bork had an activist agenda on social policy and said as much in his hearing, which is why the Dems really did a number of him, though maybe his role in Watergate had a bit to do with it too.
The GOP replacing Thurgood Marshall with Clarence Thomas was a deep insult.
Regardless of who he selects, the mere fact that Trump is the one selecting RBG's replacement is more offensive than Thomas replacing Marshall.
I'm still wondering: 1) Who paid off Kavanaugh's debts? 2) What prompted Kennedy's sudden retirement when he already had clerks lined up for fall? 3) What did 45 say to him that prompted this reaction?
https://twitter.com/eleven_films/sta...790322688?s=21
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
"Biden is a far more capable politician, that’s why RBG got 94 votes"
I see!! Biden was so skilled, that's why Ginsburg got 94 votes. Not because both sides were more civilized, it was because Biden was so skilled!
Using your logic then, can we assume Biden lost a few mph off his fastball by 2016, is that why Garland didn't get a vote?
You are hysterical. And very, very, very desperate.
"Regardless of who he selects, the mere fact that Trump is the one selecting RBG's replacement is more offensive "
I felt exactly the same way at the thought of Obama replacing Scalia. Exactly the same way. I was saved by the senate. Perhaps you will have the same fortune. We will soon see.
Unfortunately for you, there's nothing in the constitution which says you have the right to never be deeply offended.