Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
Bull#^&#^&#^&#^&.
They could have treated him with kid gloves and there is NO way the GOP, under Trump would have acted ANY differently then now.
(And I am not excusing the left from this, as they would be doing the same if the roles were reversed. )
As far as your other questions, it is possible for them to debate the record of someone like Barrett without 'attacking women'.... We'll see how it plays out and who the nominee is. I strongly suspect right now the internal polling is centered around which nominee will likely rule in Trump's favor if the election is contested at SCOTUS, as that is the only issue I think Trump actually cares about....
|
you are speculating. i can rely on graham’s long track record of playing nice with democrats. i didn’t like him, because he was practically a democrat.
bryan, look at the record with scotus.
ginsburg gets 94 votes, meaning almost every republican votes for her.
then biden created the biden rule when bush was president, saying nominations were wrong in an election year. he changed his tune 180 degrees in 2016, and i didn’t see you say he was a hypocrite of the highest order? how is his hypocrisy any different than Graham’s? and you’re voting for Biden, so...
the dems, led by Biden, attacked Bork.
They lynched Clarence Thomas.
Then Kavanaugh.
Bryan, if you want to say that both sides need to grow up, i support that. but i’ve had enough of the gop wearing boxing gloves while
democrats used brass knuckles. there’s no virtue in that. none. there’s only losing.
anyway, i’m curious how you’d differentiate biden’s hypocrisy from graham’s. good luck.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device