View Single Post
Old 09-23-2020, 07:23 AM   #27
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. View Post
Since you have such great concern about the vetting of proposed justices, why do you think it is unnecessary in the current case?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Hearing voices again. I never said anything like that.

Barrett recently went through the check for federal appeals bench, so we know a lot about her, obviously there's no serious red flags or she wouldn't have been confirmed to the federal appeals bench. 40 days, or whatever it is, is plenty of time to dig a little deeper.

I want a thorough check on her. The resources of the United States Federal Government can pull that off in a month.

Pete, this is happening. Deal with it. Ginsburg is being replaced with a staunch conservative, a devout Catholic. VERY unlikely they'll overturn Roe, but the court will not be nearly as activist as it's been for the last 40 years. If liberals want to implement a wacky agenda, they can't use the courts for now, they have to do it legislatively, which is exactly how they're supposed to do it.
Jim in CT is offline