View Single Post
Old 09-26-2020, 05:20 PM   #5
detbuch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. View Post
Another D.O.J leak. Will trump ask Barr to investigate Barr?

This was not a leak. It was declassified material openly made available to the public. And justice officials do not ask those suspected of wrongdoing to investigate themselves. That's stupid. Oh . . . that's right . . . Trump is stupid.

Imagine a large team of colleagues differed on what motivated Flynn to lie.

There was no mention, in the summary of the release that I posted, of Flynn's motives. It was not really about Flynn, per se, as much as it was about the whole investigation into Trump, the reason for the investigation of Flynn being a part of that.

Barnett is silent on Flynn's alleged violation of the FARA re: his paid work for Turkey, which would've also violated Emoluments Clause since he was a retired LTG.

Again, the post was not about a deep inquiry into Flynn. Nor did he get prosecuted for a violation of FARA. You're deflecting from what the report reveals.

Barnett is silent on Flynn's ongoing contact with Svetlana Lokhova and alleged failure to submit contact reports.

More deflection from Barnett's revelations. Nor was Flynn prosecuted for anything to do with Lokhova (which the supposed relationship is pretty much nonsense anyway).

But Barnett still said that Flynn lied. So it doesn’t matter if he doubts, he admits Flynn still lies. Somehow Barr thinks this is going to get Flynn’s whole case thrown out.
This is a total deflection from what Barnett revealed. You answered none of it. Not unusual for you. What Barnett testified to very much adds to the evidence that the Trump/Russia collusion investigation was a hoax.
detbuch is offline