[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Seems your willing to ingnore the current tyranny of the majority but you see them as the minority(Republicans)

Seems your definition of tyranny is metaphoric rather than legal. Under your assumption that current Republican rules and regulations are tyranny, we could assume that requiring drivers to stop at red lights is tyranny.

Because their Tyranny fits your views , it would have been easier to admit that

My view of "tryanny" is unlimited absolute power. So far, the Constitution is written in such a way that, if it is followed, the government is limited to having absolute power in only a few defined "enumerations." But the degradation of Constitutional text that has intentionally been, over time, foisted on it by Progressive Judges has given the federal government an expanding growth in scope and power at the expense of individual or local power, trending toward absolutism. And it is irrefutable that the founders of American Progressivism, on record, claimed that the Constitution should be replaced with a code of unlimited administrative power because the Constitution is an obstacle to government doing what it deems necessary--that government should not be impeded from doing what it wants. That is, the basic tenet of Progressive government is unlimited and absolute government power--tyranny. Of course, they consider Progressivism a beneficent tyranny.

Then 6 paragraphs blaming progressives for everything ,

Like you, I put blame where I think it is deserved.